Abstract

(41st Biennial Convention) The ongoing call for nursing education to incorporate simulation into the curriculum has resulted in nurse educators attempting to adopt new teaching strategies that enhance the student's learning experience through low, medium and high-fidelity technology. The majority of published articles on simulation in nursing education emphasize the teaching-learning experiences of faculty and students. Even leaders in the field of simulated learning encourage educators to use simulation to enhance student learning and caution educators to avoid the use of simulation as an evaluation of student learning. This perspective limits the full potential of using simulation in nursing curricula. The use of simulation in the assessment and evaluation of student learning is essential to expanding the acceptance of simulated patient care experiences. The purpose of this presentation is to expand the use of simulation in the assessment and evaluation of undergraduate nursing students and to measure programmatic level outcomes. The capstone course has incorporated simulation of Heart Failure and Closed Head Injury to identify academic-practice gaps students exhibit at the end of the program. Examples of program outcome gaps consisted of: -Lack of consistent hand hygiene -Seizure care - Glasgow coma scale - Oxygenation ranges required for various devices - Administration time for furosemide IVP - Incomplete assessments; obtaining partial information prior to contacting MD Even though significant faculty time and attention is devoted to arranging and facilitating simulation scenarios, the real work begins once the students leave. The essential element in simulation is to close the academic-practice gaps and improve healthcare delivery. This is the crucial dimension that simulation can play in program evaluation. If the information gained by nurse educators during the simulated learning experiences is not directly incorporated into program evaluation the gaps identified will never be filled to improve nursing education and healthcare delivery.

Description

41st Biennial Convention - 29 October-2 November 2011. Theme: People and Knowledge: Connecting for Global Health. Held at the Gaylord Texan Resort & convention Center.

Author Details

Colleen Royle, MS, RN; Yvette Dulohery EdS; Julie Hebenstreit EdD, RN; Angie Christian MS, RN; Norma Krumwiede EdD, RN

Sigma Membership

Unknown

Lead Author Affiliation

Minnesota State University, Mankato, Mankato, Minnesota, USA

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Teaching-learning Experiences, Assessment and Evaluation, Simulation

Conference Name

41st Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Grapevine, Texas, USA

Conference Year

2011

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Funder(s)

Sigma Foundation for Nursing

Share

COinS
 

Use of simulation to identify academic-practice gaps to improve healthcare

Grapevine, Texas, USA

(41st Biennial Convention) The ongoing call for nursing education to incorporate simulation into the curriculum has resulted in nurse educators attempting to adopt new teaching strategies that enhance the student's learning experience through low, medium and high-fidelity technology. The majority of published articles on simulation in nursing education emphasize the teaching-learning experiences of faculty and students. Even leaders in the field of simulated learning encourage educators to use simulation to enhance student learning and caution educators to avoid the use of simulation as an evaluation of student learning. This perspective limits the full potential of using simulation in nursing curricula. The use of simulation in the assessment and evaluation of student learning is essential to expanding the acceptance of simulated patient care experiences. The purpose of this presentation is to expand the use of simulation in the assessment and evaluation of undergraduate nursing students and to measure programmatic level outcomes. The capstone course has incorporated simulation of Heart Failure and Closed Head Injury to identify academic-practice gaps students exhibit at the end of the program. Examples of program outcome gaps consisted of: -Lack of consistent hand hygiene -Seizure care - Glasgow coma scale - Oxygenation ranges required for various devices - Administration time for furosemide IVP - Incomplete assessments; obtaining partial information prior to contacting MD Even though significant faculty time and attention is devoted to arranging and facilitating simulation scenarios, the real work begins once the students leave. The essential element in simulation is to close the academic-practice gaps and improve healthcare delivery. This is the crucial dimension that simulation can play in program evaluation. If the information gained by nurse educators during the simulated learning experiences is not directly incorporated into program evaluation the gaps identified will never be filled to improve nursing education and healthcare delivery.