Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether psychosocial outcomes in family caregivers of people with chronic disease differ, based on the format of online group support. Background and Significance: Fifty million Americans care for family members with chronic illness. Research on the psychosocial effects of caregiving on informal caregivers is lacking. Sample: Individuals at least 21 years old, employed, and providing care to family member with a chronic condition.

Method: Randomized longitudinal design, comparing two types of online support groups (moderated; peer-led) on the basis of three principal measures (depressive symptoms, caregiver burden, quality of life).

Results: Forty-four subjects participated (female=40; male=4). Twenty-four were assigned professionally moderated group and 20 to a group run in a peer-led format. Twenty-nine completed the questionnaires at all four timepoints. (moderated=15; peer-led=14). There were no significant differences between the groups on demographic variables. There were no significant differences in levels of depressive symptoms, caregiver burden, or quality of life between those in the moderated and peer-led groups at baseline or over time (p>0.05). Some subjects did not participate in the online discussions, but completed the study questionnaires. The presence of lurkers in this study was consistent with other reports of online support groups. A number of lurkers in online discussion groups should be expected and is not necessarily detrimental.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in psychosocial outcomes based on format of online support. The format of online support may not be as important in determining psychosocial outcomes, as the support itself. Level of participation was not significant in predicting depressive symptoms scores, caregiver burden, or QOL. Implications: Family caregivers often need information and support. This research adds to the knowledge base related to online support for family caregivers by measuring the effects of different online support group formats on specific psychosocial variables over time.

Description

41st Biennial Convention - 29 October-2 November 2011. Theme: People and Knowledge: Connecting for Global Health. Held at the Gaylord Texan Resort & Convention Center.

Author Details

Evelyn R. Hayes, PhD, APRN, BC; Cynthia A. Diefenbeck, PsyD, APRN, BC; Paula Klemm, PhD, RN, OCN

Sigma Membership

Unknown

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Psychosocial Outcomes, Online Support, Family Caregivers

Conference Name

41st Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Grapevine, Texas, USA

Conference Year

2011

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Online support for informal caregivers: Psychosocial outcomes

Grapevine, Texas, USA

Purpose: To evaluate whether psychosocial outcomes in family caregivers of people with chronic disease differ, based on the format of online group support. Background and Significance: Fifty million Americans care for family members with chronic illness. Research on the psychosocial effects of caregiving on informal caregivers is lacking. Sample: Individuals at least 21 years old, employed, and providing care to family member with a chronic condition.

Method: Randomized longitudinal design, comparing two types of online support groups (moderated; peer-led) on the basis of three principal measures (depressive symptoms, caregiver burden, quality of life).

Results: Forty-four subjects participated (female=40; male=4). Twenty-four were assigned professionally moderated group and 20 to a group run in a peer-led format. Twenty-nine completed the questionnaires at all four timepoints. (moderated=15; peer-led=14). There were no significant differences between the groups on demographic variables. There were no significant differences in levels of depressive symptoms, caregiver burden, or quality of life between those in the moderated and peer-led groups at baseline or over time (p>0.05). Some subjects did not participate in the online discussions, but completed the study questionnaires. The presence of lurkers in this study was consistent with other reports of online support groups. A number of lurkers in online discussion groups should be expected and is not necessarily detrimental.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in psychosocial outcomes based on format of online support. The format of online support may not be as important in determining psychosocial outcomes, as the support itself. Level of participation was not significant in predicting depressive symptoms scores, caregiver burden, or QOL. Implications: Family caregivers often need information and support. This research adds to the knowledge base related to online support for family caregivers by measuring the effects of different online support group formats on specific psychosocial variables over time.