Abstract

Session presented on: Tuesday, November 19, 2013:

Methods: IRB-approved online survey using six intraprofessional list serves. Characteristics of the care environment, provider, and perceived barriers to anthropometric measurements were obtained. Chi-square was used for analysis.

Results: Of 258 respondents, 139 (54%) were nurses, 46% were OP's. Half (49%) worked in medical-surgical (non-cardiac) critical care environment. Most (72%) used parental estimates of anthropometry measurements, only 3% affirmed obtaining them on admission. Both groups perceived barriers to obtaining Wt as extracorporeal life support (ECLS) (80%), hemodynamic instability (76%), and critical airway (69%); for S: hemodynamic instability (50%), medical devices (48%), and ECLS (47%); and for HC: medical devices (64%), nurse workload (38%) and ECLS (34%). Compared to nurses, more OP's perceived barriers to obtaining Wt (47% vs. 40%, p < 0.001) and HC (28% vs. 20%, p <0.001). The OP perceived barriers to Wt included nurse workload (52% vs. 34%, p = 0.004), osteopenia (46% vs. 29%, p = 0.007), and lack of importance (33% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). OP perceived barriers to head circumference included medical devices (72% vs. 57%, p = 0.01), brain trauma (42% vs. 24%, p = 0.002), and unimportance (48% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Nurse perceived barriers to S included obesity (26% vs. 15%, p = 0.04) and dialysis (21% vs. 9%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Barriers to obtaining anthropometry measurements in critically ill children exist. OP's perceived more barriers than nurses. These findings suggest a need for interdisciplinary education to overcome perceived barriers.

Description

42nd Biennial Convention 2013 Theme: Give Back to Move Forward. Held at the JW Marriott

Author Details

Sharon Y Irving, PhD, RN, CRNP; Maria R Mascarenhas, MBBS; Vijay Srinivasan, MD; Stephanie Seiple, RD, CNSC, LDN; Madeline Masucci Perkel, MSN, RN; Shiela E. Falk, RD, LDN; Monica L Nagle, RD, CNSC, LDN

Sigma Membership

Xi

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Anthropometry, Critically Ill Children, Barriers

Conference Name

42nd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Conference Year

2013

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Comparison of nurse versus ordering provider perceived barriers to anthropometry measurements in critically ill children

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Session presented on: Tuesday, November 19, 2013:

Methods: IRB-approved online survey using six intraprofessional list serves. Characteristics of the care environment, provider, and perceived barriers to anthropometric measurements were obtained. Chi-square was used for analysis.

Results: Of 258 respondents, 139 (54%) were nurses, 46% were OP's. Half (49%) worked in medical-surgical (non-cardiac) critical care environment. Most (72%) used parental estimates of anthropometry measurements, only 3% affirmed obtaining them on admission. Both groups perceived barriers to obtaining Wt as extracorporeal life support (ECLS) (80%), hemodynamic instability (76%), and critical airway (69%); for S: hemodynamic instability (50%), medical devices (48%), and ECLS (47%); and for HC: medical devices (64%), nurse workload (38%) and ECLS (34%). Compared to nurses, more OP's perceived barriers to obtaining Wt (47% vs. 40%, p < 0.001) and HC (28% vs. 20%, p <0.001). The OP perceived barriers to Wt included nurse workload (52% vs. 34%, p = 0.004), osteopenia (46% vs. 29%, p = 0.007), and lack of importance (33% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). OP perceived barriers to head circumference included medical devices (72% vs. 57%, p = 0.01), brain trauma (42% vs. 24%, p = 0.002), and unimportance (48% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Nurse perceived barriers to S included obesity (26% vs. 15%, p = 0.04) and dialysis (21% vs. 9%, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Barriers to obtaining anthropometry measurements in critically ill children exist. OP's perceived more barriers than nurses. These findings suggest a need for interdisciplinary education to overcome perceived barriers.