Abstract

Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015 and Tuesday, November 10, 2015:

Student satisfaction has been associated with later professional attitudes, career commitment, retention in the field of nursing, and more engagement as alumni of our institutions. 1-4. Assessment of student satisfaction in nursing is complex in that we must assess in-class theory courses, clinical practice, and services provided by the faculty as a whole. 2. Evaluation of all aspects of nursing education is challenging, as most university and college based programs standardized evaluations do not fit well with the multiple domains within the nursing curriculum. This issue has been further compounded in Ontario Canada by the fact that many university and College nursing programs have engaged in collaborative partnerships, in which the curriculum may be delivered by both college and university faculty and at different sites throughout the program as educational partners. Currently, all of these collaborative sites use institution-specific, system-wide student assessment tools. These independent instruments vary widely and are not specific to nursing. Hence they do not adequately address the unique characteristics of nursing education. Our research used the comprehensive Undergraduate Nursing Students' Academic Satisfaction Scale (UNSASS) 2, and the Undergraduate Nursing Students' Academic Satisfaction Scale-Short Form (UNSASS-SF). We have assessed our cohort of students for two years using an electronic evaluation process and have conducted comparative analyses of satisfaction over time. Initial results from this ongoing study suggest that nursing satisfaction may be multidimensional and site specific. Overall satisfaction with our program ranged from "satisfied" to "very satisfied" across all sites. The majority of our nursing students were Caucasian, without children, and most were working at least part time. Conflict, on many fronts, emerged as a singular issue that decreased satisfaction throughout all aspects of the program. This presentation will discuss a) the results found using the UNSASS across multiple sites; b) the use of the UNSASS-SF; c) found major contributors of satisfaction amongst our students and d) concerning trends that are impacting on satisfaction across all sites.

1. Butterfield, W., Deusinger, S., Gillespie, D., Smithe, J., & Strube, M. (1998). Personal, interpersonal, and organizational influences on student satisfaction with clinical education. Physical Therapy, 78(6), 635-654.

2. Gruber, T., Reppel, A., & Voss, R. (2010). Understanding the characteristics of effective professors: the student's perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(2), 175-190. doi:10.1080/08841241.2010.526356

3. Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 571-588. doi: 10.1080/14783360601074315

4. Lafmark, A., Thorkildsen, K., Raholm, M., & Natvig, G., K. (2012). Nursing students' satisfaction with supervision from preceptors and teachers during clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 12, 164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.12.005

5. Dennison, S & El-Masri, M.,M. (2012). Development and psychometric assessment of the undergraduate nursing students' academic satisfaction scale (UNSASS). The Journal of Nursing Measurement, 20(2), 75-89.

Description

43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.

Author Details

Laurie Freeman-Gibb, PhD, ANP-BC, RN; Beverley L. Jones, MScN, MPA (Health Policy), BScN, BA (Life Sciences), RN; Janet E. Raiger, RN; Selina Rehman, RN

Sigma Membership

Tau Upsilon

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Students, Eduction, Satisfaction

Conference Name

43rd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Results from a longitudinal nursing specific undergraduate student satisfaction survey across a Canadian collaborative nursing program

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015 and Tuesday, November 10, 2015:

Student satisfaction has been associated with later professional attitudes, career commitment, retention in the field of nursing, and more engagement as alumni of our institutions. 1-4. Assessment of student satisfaction in nursing is complex in that we must assess in-class theory courses, clinical practice, and services provided by the faculty as a whole. 2. Evaluation of all aspects of nursing education is challenging, as most university and college based programs standardized evaluations do not fit well with the multiple domains within the nursing curriculum. This issue has been further compounded in Ontario Canada by the fact that many university and College nursing programs have engaged in collaborative partnerships, in which the curriculum may be delivered by both college and university faculty and at different sites throughout the program as educational partners. Currently, all of these collaborative sites use institution-specific, system-wide student assessment tools. These independent instruments vary widely and are not specific to nursing. Hence they do not adequately address the unique characteristics of nursing education. Our research used the comprehensive Undergraduate Nursing Students' Academic Satisfaction Scale (UNSASS) 2, and the Undergraduate Nursing Students' Academic Satisfaction Scale-Short Form (UNSASS-SF). We have assessed our cohort of students for two years using an electronic evaluation process and have conducted comparative analyses of satisfaction over time. Initial results from this ongoing study suggest that nursing satisfaction may be multidimensional and site specific. Overall satisfaction with our program ranged from "satisfied" to "very satisfied" across all sites. The majority of our nursing students were Caucasian, without children, and most were working at least part time. Conflict, on many fronts, emerged as a singular issue that decreased satisfaction throughout all aspects of the program. This presentation will discuss a) the results found using the UNSASS across multiple sites; b) the use of the UNSASS-SF; c) found major contributors of satisfaction amongst our students and d) concerning trends that are impacting on satisfaction across all sites.

1. Butterfield, W., Deusinger, S., Gillespie, D., Smithe, J., & Strube, M. (1998). Personal, interpersonal, and organizational influences on student satisfaction with clinical education. Physical Therapy, 78(6), 635-654.

2. Gruber, T., Reppel, A., & Voss, R. (2010). Understanding the characteristics of effective professors: the student's perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(2), 175-190. doi:10.1080/08841241.2010.526356

3. Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 571-588. doi: 10.1080/14783360601074315

4. Lafmark, A., Thorkildsen, K., Raholm, M., & Natvig, G., K. (2012). Nursing students' satisfaction with supervision from preceptors and teachers during clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 12, 164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2011.12.005

5. Dennison, S & El-Masri, M.,M. (2012). Development and psychometric assessment of the undergraduate nursing students' academic satisfaction scale (UNSASS). The Journal of Nursing Measurement, 20(2), 75-89.