Abstract
Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015 and Tuesday, November 10, 2015:
The ongoing verification of Nasogastric Tube location presents a challenging clinical dilemma and the risk to the patient of incorrect placement is grave. Current practice demonstrates almost universal continuance of practices that have been demonstrated to be unsafe. Chief among these would be the continued use of auscultation as a verification strategy. The purpose of this project was to examine the body of evidence using a structured Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) process to determine research based strategies. The background search resulted in consistent recommendation for the use of X-ray for initial verification. In addition, this phase of the search also resulted in a recommendation regarding proper measurement of the tube length prior to insertion. These recommendations will be included with the recommendations made regarding ongoing verification. The evidence was searched using a PICO question: "In patients with NG tubes, how does pH testing of gastric aspirate affect verification of correct tube placement?" The choice of the pH technique was selected based upon its consistent representation in the body of available evidence. Appraised evidence included primarily Level IV studies and Level VII expert opinion. This issue appeared to have been intensively studied in the late 1990's and early 2000's, and therefore some of the selected evidence exceeds ten years. After synthesis of the evidence, six recommendations for practice were made related to initial placement technique, initial X-ray verification and ongoing verification. The primary recommendation that would improve practice is the need to do pH testing of aspirate and one additional verification strategy every time the tube is accessed for care. Current practice is auscultation of an air bolus, which the evidence supports as being unreliable and unsafe. This project, if disseminated, has the potential to improve patient safety by reducing the risk of untoward events related to displacement of the tube. The investigation indicates that more research is needed in identifying a consistently safe and reliable method for ongoing bedside verification of nasogastric tube placement.
Sigma Membership
Theta Theta
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Evidence-Based Practice, Nasogastric Tube, Verification
Recommended Citation
Decker, Roxy Lee and Black, Andrea Elizabeth, "Ongoing nasogastric tube verification: The evidence" (2016). Convention. 190.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/convention/2015/posters_2015/190
Conference Name
43rd Biennial Convention
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Conference Year
2015
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Ongoing nasogastric tube verification: The evidence
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015 and Tuesday, November 10, 2015:
The ongoing verification of Nasogastric Tube location presents a challenging clinical dilemma and the risk to the patient of incorrect placement is grave. Current practice demonstrates almost universal continuance of practices that have been demonstrated to be unsafe. Chief among these would be the continued use of auscultation as a verification strategy. The purpose of this project was to examine the body of evidence using a structured Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) process to determine research based strategies. The background search resulted in consistent recommendation for the use of X-ray for initial verification. In addition, this phase of the search also resulted in a recommendation regarding proper measurement of the tube length prior to insertion. These recommendations will be included with the recommendations made regarding ongoing verification. The evidence was searched using a PICO question: "In patients with NG tubes, how does pH testing of gastric aspirate affect verification of correct tube placement?" The choice of the pH technique was selected based upon its consistent representation in the body of available evidence. Appraised evidence included primarily Level IV studies and Level VII expert opinion. This issue appeared to have been intensively studied in the late 1990's and early 2000's, and therefore some of the selected evidence exceeds ten years. After synthesis of the evidence, six recommendations for practice were made related to initial placement technique, initial X-ray verification and ongoing verification. The primary recommendation that would improve practice is the need to do pH testing of aspirate and one additional verification strategy every time the tube is accessed for care. Current practice is auscultation of an air bolus, which the evidence supports as being unreliable and unsafe. This project, if disseminated, has the potential to improve patient safety by reducing the risk of untoward events related to displacement of the tube. The investigation indicates that more research is needed in identifying a consistently safe and reliable method for ongoing bedside verification of nasogastric tube placement.
Description
43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.