Abstract

Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015:

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal health problems such as low back pain contribute significantly to morbidity in the general population and contribute to the high costs of health care in the industrialized world. Pilates is an evidence-based form of therapeutic exercise found to improve low back pain and is underutilized in the healthcare setting.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of Pilates exercise on the Cadillac exercise machine as a therapeutic intervention for chronic low back pain and disability.

METHODS: The study was quasi-experimental one-group pre test post test pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of a Pilates protocol using the Cadillac exercise machine to decrease levels of pain, and increase function. Data were extracted from a SPSS analysis of a pain visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI).

RESULTS: The results indicate that the Pilates intervention was effective for reducing pain and improving function. VAS before the intervention were M = 41.83 13.12 and after the intervention were M = 11.08 19.49. The mean difference calculated was 30.75 20.27, CI = 43.63, 17.87, p < 0001. ODI scores before the intervention were M = 23.83 16.57 and after the intervention M = 12.58 12.29, respectively. The mean difference calculated from the paired t test from before and after the intervention was 11.25 13.20, CI =19.64, -2.86, P < .02.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will inform clinical practice recommendations and direct subsequent research.

Description

43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.

Author Details

Dana D. Stieglitz, RN, DNP, FNP-BC

Sigma Membership

Zeta Eta at-Large

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Pilates, Chronic low back pain

Conference Name

43rd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Pilates Cadillac for chronic low back pain: A pilot study

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015:

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal health problems such as low back pain contribute significantly to morbidity in the general population and contribute to the high costs of health care in the industrialized world. Pilates is an evidence-based form of therapeutic exercise found to improve low back pain and is underutilized in the healthcare setting.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of Pilates exercise on the Cadillac exercise machine as a therapeutic intervention for chronic low back pain and disability.

METHODS: The study was quasi-experimental one-group pre test post test pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of a Pilates protocol using the Cadillac exercise machine to decrease levels of pain, and increase function. Data were extracted from a SPSS analysis of a pain visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI).

RESULTS: The results indicate that the Pilates intervention was effective for reducing pain and improving function. VAS before the intervention were M = 41.83 13.12 and after the intervention were M = 11.08 19.49. The mean difference calculated was 30.75 20.27, CI = 43.63, 17.87, p < 0001. ODI scores before the intervention were M = 23.83 16.57 and after the intervention M = 12.58 12.29, respectively. The mean difference calculated from the paired t test from before and after the intervention was 11.25 13.20, CI =19.64, -2.86, P < .02.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will inform clinical practice recommendations and direct subsequent research.