Abstract

Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015:

An exploration of medical professionals' perspectives on medical futility Background: Advanced medical technology helps extend the lives of critical patients. Under certain circumstances, medical interventions only prolong patients' life without ensuring an acceptable quality of life. Therefore, futile treatments are considered wasteful from the perspective of the national health insurance system. Because the term "medical futility" is used in many different ways, it is difficult to define and, therefore, also difficult to assess. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to explore nurses' and physicians' perspective on medical futility. Methods: A phenomenology approach and purposive sampling was applied. Participants were 7 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses working in medical centers in central Taiwan who had more than one year working experience that included experience taking care of critical patients. Following Jovchelovitch and Bauer (2000), a 4-phase narrative interview procedure was used, and data analysis was applied using the Colaizzi (1978) method. Five physicians who worked at ICUs or had experience taking care of critical patients were invited to participate in one-to-one interviews. After the physicians had fully expressed their perspectives on medical futility, medical futility case stories which had been developed from previous interviews with ICU nurses were introduced to the physicians. Four major themes emerged, including definition of medical futility, types of medically futile patients, ethical considerations regarding medical futility, and professional positions on medically futile treatment and nursing care. The trustworthiness of the study was examined using Lincoln and Guba (1985) principles. Contributions: The results of this research could help medical professionals to understand medical futility in clinical situations. The case stories developed from the study's narrative interviews will also be of value in clinical health care, multi-professional communication, and life-ethics education.

Description

43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.

Authors

Ming Yi Hsu

Author Details

Ming Yi Hsu, RN, LPN

Sigma Membership

Lambda Beta at-Large

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Medical Futility, Non-Beneficial Treatments, Critical Patients

Conference Name

43rd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

An exploration of medical professionals' perspectives on medical futility

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015:

An exploration of medical professionals' perspectives on medical futility Background: Advanced medical technology helps extend the lives of critical patients. Under certain circumstances, medical interventions only prolong patients' life without ensuring an acceptable quality of life. Therefore, futile treatments are considered wasteful from the perspective of the national health insurance system. Because the term "medical futility" is used in many different ways, it is difficult to define and, therefore, also difficult to assess. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to explore nurses' and physicians' perspective on medical futility. Methods: A phenomenology approach and purposive sampling was applied. Participants were 7 Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses working in medical centers in central Taiwan who had more than one year working experience that included experience taking care of critical patients. Following Jovchelovitch and Bauer (2000), a 4-phase narrative interview procedure was used, and data analysis was applied using the Colaizzi (1978) method. Five physicians who worked at ICUs or had experience taking care of critical patients were invited to participate in one-to-one interviews. After the physicians had fully expressed their perspectives on medical futility, medical futility case stories which had been developed from previous interviews with ICU nurses were introduced to the physicians. Four major themes emerged, including definition of medical futility, types of medically futile patients, ethical considerations regarding medical futility, and professional positions on medically futile treatment and nursing care. The trustworthiness of the study was examined using Lincoln and Guba (1985) principles. Contributions: The results of this research could help medical professionals to understand medical futility in clinical situations. The case stories developed from the study's narrative interviews will also be of value in clinical health care, multi-professional communication, and life-ethics education.