Abstract

Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015:

The human and economic burden related to ineffective pain management is well documented. Factors influencing ineffective acute pain management are multi-factorial and include failure of healthcare professionals to accurately and reliably assess and meet patient's individual pain management requirements. The discipline has been absent an approach and tools enabling reliable, safe, patient-centric assessment and management of pain. Historically, acute pain treatment is focused on the primary admitting condition, which can inadvertently exacerbate existing addiction and improperly manage the patient pain needs. This further potentiates provider biases that conflict with evidence-based pain management strategies. To address these concerns, an interprofessional team was assembled including direct care nurses, clinical nurse specialists, chemical dependency consultants, educators, pharmacists, physicians and hospital leadership. A system pilot was designed with a four prong approach: education of the provider of opioid selection and utilization, tiered approach for assessment of patient experience and tolerance with opioids, consistent and reliable evidenced based selection and administration of opioids, structure and processes enabling surveillance and escalation of pain management. Tiers are assigned based on patients' daily use of opioids. The program uses a systematic, reliable, evidence-based approach to expedite treatment options and interprofessional consultation to design a plan customized to the patient's needs through clearly defined orders. Information system tools were developed to aid transparency and access to data that supports evidence based pain management. An escalation process was created to identify variances and build a robust learning cycle for enhanced program reliability. Program evaluation measures include the following: patient experience (harm composite and satisfaction scores), provider (rate of adoption and nursing knowledge). Preliminary results (n=400) reveal high provider satisfaction, wide-spread adoption, and most importantly improved patient experience including a zero percentage harm composite. Clinical scholarship aligning and integrating implementation science and innovation has the capacity to advance the practice of nursing, patient care delivery, and most importantly exceed the needs of those we are privileged to serve. Additionally, providers can customize standardized pain pathways with less bias while maintaining autonomy in practice and promoting a consistent plan of care across the continuum.

Description

43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.

Authors

Jill S. Payne

Author Details

Jill S. Payne, RN, CNML, CENP

Sigma Membership

Lambda Epsilon

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Translational Research, Pain, Safety

Conference Name

43rd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Acute pain management: Impact of opioid tolerance leveling on patient, provider, and system outcomes

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015:

The human and economic burden related to ineffective pain management is well documented. Factors influencing ineffective acute pain management are multi-factorial and include failure of healthcare professionals to accurately and reliably assess and meet patient's individual pain management requirements. The discipline has been absent an approach and tools enabling reliable, safe, patient-centric assessment and management of pain. Historically, acute pain treatment is focused on the primary admitting condition, which can inadvertently exacerbate existing addiction and improperly manage the patient pain needs. This further potentiates provider biases that conflict with evidence-based pain management strategies. To address these concerns, an interprofessional team was assembled including direct care nurses, clinical nurse specialists, chemical dependency consultants, educators, pharmacists, physicians and hospital leadership. A system pilot was designed with a four prong approach: education of the provider of opioid selection and utilization, tiered approach for assessment of patient experience and tolerance with opioids, consistent and reliable evidenced based selection and administration of opioids, structure and processes enabling surveillance and escalation of pain management. Tiers are assigned based on patients' daily use of opioids. The program uses a systematic, reliable, evidence-based approach to expedite treatment options and interprofessional consultation to design a plan customized to the patient's needs through clearly defined orders. Information system tools were developed to aid transparency and access to data that supports evidence based pain management. An escalation process was created to identify variances and build a robust learning cycle for enhanced program reliability. Program evaluation measures include the following: patient experience (harm composite and satisfaction scores), provider (rate of adoption and nursing knowledge). Preliminary results (n=400) reveal high provider satisfaction, wide-spread adoption, and most importantly improved patient experience including a zero percentage harm composite. Clinical scholarship aligning and integrating implementation science and innovation has the capacity to advance the practice of nursing, patient care delivery, and most importantly exceed the needs of those we are privileged to serve. Additionally, providers can customize standardized pain pathways with less bias while maintaining autonomy in practice and promoting a consistent plan of care across the continuum.