Abstract
Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015: The Doctorate of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a newer degree endorsed by the American Nurses Association (ANA) in 2004 as the practice doctorate degree. There continues to be confusion as to the benefits of the DNP in academia. The counterpart PhD focuses on research based strategies and is the chosen degree for tenure in university settings. Controversy surrounding "academic rigor" of the DNP presents a barrier for not offering tenure to DNP prepared faculty. Unfortunately, there have been negative viewpoints that ultimately impact the tenure potential for the DNP prepared nurse educator in an academic setting. Many university settings don't consider the DNP candidate for classroom instruction; however, the rationale for this practice is not clearly defined. It is advantageous for both the PhD and DNP to collaborate in the classroom setting, sharing both clinical and research experiences, which will aid in strengthening the nursing profession overall. This has resulted some conflict with regard to the value of the DNP in the academic setting, and also a lack of support in the evidence that is necessary to demonstrate the credibility of the DNP degree. It is necessary to demonstrate credibility of the DNP degree and to debunk preconceived impressions by doctoral prepared colleagues. The contributions of the DNP prepared nursed educator cannot be overlooked, regardless of whether they are being considered for research based publications, or for tenure track. Graduates of either a PhD or DNP programs have not specifically prepared for a faculty teaching role, and upon graduation both still require mentoring and preparation in teaching methodologies, program development, and curriculum design. Exploring the value of the DNP degree in nursing education, and how it compliments other terminal nursing degrees must be explored, and ultimately the best of what each has to offer for the benefit and success of nursing students and the profession of nursing.
Sigma Membership
Phi Pi
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
DNP, Terminal degree comparison
Recommended Citation
Simpson, Cari S. and Anderson, Diane A., "The Value of the DNP (Doctorate of Nursing Practice) in Nursing Education" (2016). Convention. 467.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/convention/2015/posters_2015/467
Conference Name
43rd Biennial Convention
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Conference Year
2015
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
The Value of the DNP (Doctorate of Nursing Practice) in Nursing Education
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Session presented on Saturday, November 7, 2015 and Sunday, November 8, 2015: The Doctorate of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a newer degree endorsed by the American Nurses Association (ANA) in 2004 as the practice doctorate degree. There continues to be confusion as to the benefits of the DNP in academia. The counterpart PhD focuses on research based strategies and is the chosen degree for tenure in university settings. Controversy surrounding "academic rigor" of the DNP presents a barrier for not offering tenure to DNP prepared faculty. Unfortunately, there have been negative viewpoints that ultimately impact the tenure potential for the DNP prepared nurse educator in an academic setting. Many university settings don't consider the DNP candidate for classroom instruction; however, the rationale for this practice is not clearly defined. It is advantageous for both the PhD and DNP to collaborate in the classroom setting, sharing both clinical and research experiences, which will aid in strengthening the nursing profession overall. This has resulted some conflict with regard to the value of the DNP in the academic setting, and also a lack of support in the evidence that is necessary to demonstrate the credibility of the DNP degree. It is necessary to demonstrate credibility of the DNP degree and to debunk preconceived impressions by doctoral prepared colleagues. The contributions of the DNP prepared nursed educator cannot be overlooked, regardless of whether they are being considered for research based publications, or for tenure track. Graduates of either a PhD or DNP programs have not specifically prepared for a faculty teaching role, and upon graduation both still require mentoring and preparation in teaching methodologies, program development, and curriculum design. Exploring the value of the DNP degree in nursing education, and how it compliments other terminal nursing degrees must be explored, and ultimately the best of what each has to offer for the benefit and success of nursing students and the profession of nursing.
Description
43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.`