Abstract
The incidence of infection due to perineal tears during water births is unknown. Approximately 75% of all women who give birth vaginally will suffer from various levels of birth lacerations (Lundquist, Olsson, Nissen, & Norman, 2000). One in ten women who received a perineal laceration during a vaginal delivery later developed an infection (Johnson, Thakar, & Sultan, 2012). The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of water birth on maternal perineal infection in comparison to traditional birthing methods in California. The goal of this study is to determine the difference in perineal infection rates between these two birthing styles. This study defines perineal infection as the presence of swelling and redness at the wound, use of antibiotics, and fever. Fever will be measured using an electronic oral thermometer that will be calibrated per facility protocol and is classified as a temperature reading greater than 38 degrees Celsius. The study will implement a causal-comparative design including low risk mothers who fit within the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this study, sampling will occur through random clustering of charts from 2013 of pregnant women who received a perineal tear at one of 20 California birthing centers that offer traditional and water births. One group will consist of women who used the traditional birth method. The other group will be comprised of women who chose the water birth method. Data will be collected retrospectively from patient files within the sampling groups. All information is confidential and no names were used throughout the study. To ensure confidentiality, all information gathered will be kept in securely locked electronic files on the laptops. Each participant will be given a reference number by which to be identified; her name will not be used to identify her. The patient's information and whether the patient displays the above mentioned defining characteristics of infection will all be recorded on the data collection form. Data will be analyzed using the Chi Square test of independence with a p-value of 0.05% was used to ensure external validity. Implications of this proposed study are patient safety, fiscal responsibility, patient satisfaction, and improvement in practice.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Infection, Birthing, Birthing Method
Recommended Citation
Sinkevich, Sasha; Snyder, Natalee J.; Palmer, Stephanie A.; and Singleton, Nicollette, "Infection rates in traditional vaginal birth vs. water birth" (2016). Convention. 477.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/convention/2015/posters_2015/477
Conference Name
43rd Biennial Convention
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Conference Year
2015
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Infection rates in traditional vaginal birth vs. water birth
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
The incidence of infection due to perineal tears during water births is unknown. Approximately 75% of all women who give birth vaginally will suffer from various levels of birth lacerations (Lundquist, Olsson, Nissen, & Norman, 2000). One in ten women who received a perineal laceration during a vaginal delivery later developed an infection (Johnson, Thakar, & Sultan, 2012). The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of water birth on maternal perineal infection in comparison to traditional birthing methods in California. The goal of this study is to determine the difference in perineal infection rates between these two birthing styles. This study defines perineal infection as the presence of swelling and redness at the wound, use of antibiotics, and fever. Fever will be measured using an electronic oral thermometer that will be calibrated per facility protocol and is classified as a temperature reading greater than 38 degrees Celsius. The study will implement a causal-comparative design including low risk mothers who fit within the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this study, sampling will occur through random clustering of charts from 2013 of pregnant women who received a perineal tear at one of 20 California birthing centers that offer traditional and water births. One group will consist of women who used the traditional birth method. The other group will be comprised of women who chose the water birth method. Data will be collected retrospectively from patient files within the sampling groups. All information is confidential and no names were used throughout the study. To ensure confidentiality, all information gathered will be kept in securely locked electronic files on the laptops. Each participant will be given a reference number by which to be identified; her name will not be used to identify her. The patient's information and whether the patient displays the above mentioned defining characteristics of infection will all be recorded on the data collection form. Data will be analyzed using the Chi Square test of independence with a p-value of 0.05% was used to ensure external validity. Implications of this proposed study are patient safety, fiscal responsibility, patient satisfaction, and improvement in practice.
Description
43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.`