Other Titles

The Use of Tools and Instruments to Advance the Profession [Session]

Abstract

Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015:

More than 200 million children under five fail to reach their cognitive potential due to poverty, poor health, poor nutrition and lack of care. Providing increased cognitive stimulation or learning opportunities to young children significantly increases cognitive and social-emotional competence later in life. An interdisciplinary team of students from the United States worked with the University of Venda and the Vhembe Health District in Limpopo to determine the acceptability and feasibility of a pediatric assessment tool and program to track child development in a rural health district in Limpopo, South Africa. A total of 11 primary health nurses from the region in two focus groups were selected to learn and compare two child development assessment tools: the Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). Data were analyzed using versus coding to compare between the two focus groups and between ASQ and CAT/CLAMS. There were no major differences in the opinions between the two focus groups. The major categories that emerged from the discussion were current practice, usability, resource management, cultural adaptation, patient and parent factors, and new knowledge. The two tools were compared within these categories and the Ages and Stages program was most feasible for this population. This study is the first to investigate any type of child developmental assessment in rural, sub-Saharan Africa, and is a small step to improving overall child health in this region through developmental tracking and parental education.

Description

43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.

Author Details

Gwyneth Rhiannon Milbrath, RN, CEN; Audrey Ogendi, BA; Madison B. Compton; Vidya V. Gopinath, BS; Claire M. Constance

Sigma Membership

Beta Kappa

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Child Development, Qualitative Research, Global Health

Conference Name

43rd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Selecting an early child development assessment tool in rural Limpopo, South Africa

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015:

More than 200 million children under five fail to reach their cognitive potential due to poverty, poor health, poor nutrition and lack of care. Providing increased cognitive stimulation or learning opportunities to young children significantly increases cognitive and social-emotional competence later in life. An interdisciplinary team of students from the United States worked with the University of Venda and the Vhembe Health District in Limpopo to determine the acceptability and feasibility of a pediatric assessment tool and program to track child development in a rural health district in Limpopo, South Africa. A total of 11 primary health nurses from the region in two focus groups were selected to learn and compare two child development assessment tools: the Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ). Data were analyzed using versus coding to compare between the two focus groups and between ASQ and CAT/CLAMS. There were no major differences in the opinions between the two focus groups. The major categories that emerged from the discussion were current practice, usability, resource management, cultural adaptation, patient and parent factors, and new knowledge. The two tools were compared within these categories and the Ages and Stages program was most feasible for this population. This study is the first to investigate any type of child developmental assessment in rural, sub-Saharan Africa, and is a small step to improving overall child health in this region through developmental tracking and parental education.