Other Titles

Improving Clinical Teaching Methods [Session]

Abstract

Session presented on Sunday, November 8, 2015:

Associate degree nursing (ADN) students were having challenges understanding their role in the quality improvement (QI) process furthermore, NCLEX was including more questions on QI. A collaborative project was developed between a community college ADN program and the county hospital. The topic selected was the nonconformity on restraints from the most recent hospital regulatory survey. Students attended a class on QI, EBP, regulatory agencies, and how to create scientific posters. Students were randomized into groups of 4. The student groups then created a group charter outlining each team member's responsibility, timelines, and consequences of failing to participate fully in the project. Students received copies of most recent regulatory survey findings, current hospital policy, and web links to Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) information on restraints. Students examined the regulations regarding restraints, differentiated the types of restraints and learned about the nurses responsibilities when caring for patients in restraints. This information was then translated into a scientific poster. Students also participated in QI during clinical rotations by helping during NDNQI Skin Survey day, and attending Quality Management (QM) meetings. Students presented posters at hospital shared governance council meeting. Posters were set up conference style and students presented as hospital staff rotated between posters. Hospital staff completed an evaluation form and a winning poster was determined. Students also presented posters to second and third semester nursing students and advisory board members. Posters were then given to hospital educators to use for in-services on restraints. The project helped address QSEN competencies in the areas of evidence-based practice (EBP), quality improvement (QI), teamwork and collaboration. Students were asked to evaluate the project process and accomplishment of identified objectives and evaluate their team members participation in the project (peer eval). Improved scores on ATI predictor test Indicator: QI from 78.5% to 91.2%, students stated they "felt professional during the presentation", became more "focused on safety", began "looking for ways to improve care", and were more "patient centered when providing care during clinical rotations". Several students connected to the project on an emotional level, and discussed how they would feel if their family members were restrained.

Description

43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.`

Author Details

Rebekah Powers, DNP, RN-BC, CMSRN, CSPHA; Christina Ramdeo, RN, CNOR, CHTS-CP; Laurie Brannigan, RN

Sigma Membership

Delta Kappa

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Quality Improvement, QSEN Competencies, Collaboration

Conference Name

43rd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

A collaborative project to improve associate degree nursing students knowledge, skills and attitudes about quality improvement

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Session presented on Sunday, November 8, 2015:

Associate degree nursing (ADN) students were having challenges understanding their role in the quality improvement (QI) process furthermore, NCLEX was including more questions on QI. A collaborative project was developed between a community college ADN program and the county hospital. The topic selected was the nonconformity on restraints from the most recent hospital regulatory survey. Students attended a class on QI, EBP, regulatory agencies, and how to create scientific posters. Students were randomized into groups of 4. The student groups then created a group charter outlining each team member's responsibility, timelines, and consequences of failing to participate fully in the project. Students received copies of most recent regulatory survey findings, current hospital policy, and web links to Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) information on restraints. Students examined the regulations regarding restraints, differentiated the types of restraints and learned about the nurses responsibilities when caring for patients in restraints. This information was then translated into a scientific poster. Students also participated in QI during clinical rotations by helping during NDNQI Skin Survey day, and attending Quality Management (QM) meetings. Students presented posters at hospital shared governance council meeting. Posters were set up conference style and students presented as hospital staff rotated between posters. Hospital staff completed an evaluation form and a winning poster was determined. Students also presented posters to second and third semester nursing students and advisory board members. Posters were then given to hospital educators to use for in-services on restraints. The project helped address QSEN competencies in the areas of evidence-based practice (EBP), quality improvement (QI), teamwork and collaboration. Students were asked to evaluate the project process and accomplishment of identified objectives and evaluate their team members participation in the project (peer eval). Improved scores on ATI predictor test Indicator: QI from 78.5% to 91.2%, students stated they "felt professional during the presentation", became more "focused on safety", began "looking for ways to improve care", and were more "patient centered when providing care during clinical rotations". Several students connected to the project on an emotional level, and discussed how they would feel if their family members were restrained.