Other Titles

The Use of Tools and Instruments to Advance the Profession [Session]

Abstract

Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015:

Background: The lack of reliable and valid evaluation tools targeting Korean nursing students' critical thinking (CT) abilities has been reported as one of the barriers to instructing and evaluating students in undergraduate programs. Yoon's Critical Thinking Disposition (YCTD) instrument was developed for Korean nursing students, but few studies have assessed its validity and reliability.

Objectives: This study aimed to validate the YCTD. Specifically, the YCTD was assessed to identify its cross-sectional and longitudinal measurement invariance.

Methods: This was a validation study in which a cross-sectional and longitudinal (pre- and post-nursing practicum) survey was used to validate the YCTD using 345 nursing students at three univeristies in Seoul, Korea. The participants' CT abilities were assessed using the YCTD before and after completing and established pediatric nursing practicum. The validity of the YCTD was estimated and then group invariance test using multi-group CFA was performed to confirm the measurement compatibility of multi-groups.

Results: A test of the seven-factor model showed that the YCTD demonstrated good construct validity. Multi-group CFA findings for the measurement invariance suggested that this model structure demonstrated strong invariance between groups (i.e., configural, factor loading, and intercept combined) but weak invariance within a group (i.e., configural and factor loading combined).

Conclusions: In general, traditional methods for assessing instrument validity have been less than thorough. In the study, multi-group CFA using cross-sectional and longitudinal measurement data allowed validation of the YCTD. The study conclued that the YCTD can be used to evaluate Korean nursing students' CT abilities.

Description

43rd Biennial Convention 2015 Theme: Serve Locally, Transform Regionally, Lead Globally.

Author Details

Hyunsook Shin, PhD, RN, CPNP; Kaka Shim, MSN; Yuna Lee, MSN; Hyunhee Ma, MSN; Dahae Lim, BSN; Hyojin Kim, BSN; Hyejin Kim, BSN

Sigma Membership

Lambda Alpha at-Large

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Critical Thinking, Tool Validation

Conference Name

43rd Biennial Convention

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Validation of Yoon's Critical Thinking Disposition Instrument

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Session presented on Monday, November 9, 2015:

Background: The lack of reliable and valid evaluation tools targeting Korean nursing students' critical thinking (CT) abilities has been reported as one of the barriers to instructing and evaluating students in undergraduate programs. Yoon's Critical Thinking Disposition (YCTD) instrument was developed for Korean nursing students, but few studies have assessed its validity and reliability.

Objectives: This study aimed to validate the YCTD. Specifically, the YCTD was assessed to identify its cross-sectional and longitudinal measurement invariance.

Methods: This was a validation study in which a cross-sectional and longitudinal (pre- and post-nursing practicum) survey was used to validate the YCTD using 345 nursing students at three univeristies in Seoul, Korea. The participants' CT abilities were assessed using the YCTD before and after completing and established pediatric nursing practicum. The validity of the YCTD was estimated and then group invariance test using multi-group CFA was performed to confirm the measurement compatibility of multi-groups.

Results: A test of the seven-factor model showed that the YCTD demonstrated good construct validity. Multi-group CFA findings for the measurement invariance suggested that this model structure demonstrated strong invariance between groups (i.e., configural, factor loading, and intercept combined) but weak invariance within a group (i.e., configural and factor loading combined).

Conclusions: In general, traditional methods for assessing instrument validity have been less than thorough. In the study, multi-group CFA using cross-sectional and longitudinal measurement data allowed validation of the YCTD. The study conclued that the YCTD can be used to evaluate Korean nursing students' CT abilities.