Abstract
The development of pressure ulcers is a common and expensive problem within acute care hospitals. Nurses are expected to identify patients at risk for pressure ulcers and provide preventative interventions accordingly. The purpose of this descriptive correlational study was to identify what preventative nursing interventions were being used, and to examine relationships between pressure ulcer risk, nursing interventions, and pressure ulcer presence in two acute care facilities. Bloch's (1975) Framework for the Evaluation of Nursing Care and Braden's (1987) Conceptual Schema for the Development of Pressure Sores provided the conceptual framework for the study.
Sigma Membership
Delta Psi at-Large, Epsilon Omega, Xi Alpha
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Cross-Sectional
Research Approach
Quantitative Research
Keywords:
Pressure Ulcers, Wound Care, Patient Treatments
Advisor
Anne Young
Degree
PhD
Degree Grantor
Texas Woman's University
Degree Year
1992
Recommended Citation
Prevost, Suzanne S., "Relationships between pressure ulcer risk potential, nursing interventions, and pressure ulcer presence" (2019). Dissertations. 1688.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/1688
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2019-05-23
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 9312916; ProQuest document ID: 304033413. The author still retains copyright.