Comparison of two methods for measuring the tangible outcomes of an associate degree nursing program
Abstract
The purposes of this study were (a) to describe and measure the tangible outcomes of an Associate Degree Nursing (ADN) program for the graduate, the community, and cooperating clinical agencies; and (b) to propose a methodology that explicates the tangible outcomes of an ADN program. Using a descriptive design, tangible outcomes of one ADN program at a North Central Alabama community college were measured, collection methods were evaluated for effectiveness and efficiency, and the need for training of data collection staff was evaluated.
Sigma Membership
Gamma Eta
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Cohort
Research Approach
Quantitative Research
Keywords:
Nursing Associate Degree, Nursing Education, Measuring Outcomes
Advisor
Rachel Z. Booth
Degree
Doctoral-Other
Degree Grantor
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Degree Year
2001
Recommended Citation
Elliott, Denise Hooper, "Comparison of two methods for measuring the tangible outcomes of an associate degree nursing program" (2019). Dissertations. 1701.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/1701
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2019-05-06
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 3040918; ProQuest document ID: 275950905. The author still retains copyright.