Abstract
Educating staff nurses is pivotal in the evolving healthcare environment. Two staff development models used in the healthcare setting are unit-based and centralized. Unit-based education is a staff development model that places educators on individual units. These educators direct the educational development of staff nurses on their assigned units. Centralized education meets generalized learning needs and provides nursing departments with scheduled education sessions or impromptu meetings regarding changes to policies and procedures. In addition, centralized educators are assigned to address the learning needs of the nurses on several units with universal orientation (Cummings & McCaskey, 1992), coordinate and implement intravenous and blood transfusion therapy courses, physical assessment courses, professional update programs, and universal workshops and conferences (Cummings & McCaskey, 1992). In contrast, unit-based educators are more familiar with the unit's practices and staff nurses while providing more individualized staff education than the centralized model. This research was conducted to explore the association between the type of staff development model and staff nurses' evaluations of their clinical educators, their anxiety, and their clinical reasoning.
Sigma Membership
Unknown
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Cross-Sectional
Research Approach
Quantitative Research
Keywords:
Unit-Based Education, Adult Learning Theory, Clinical Educators
Advisor
Kathleen O'Connell
Degree
Doctoral-Other
Degree Grantor
Teachers College, Columbia University
Degree Year
2023
Recommended Citation
Campbell, Marilyn J., "A comparison between unit-based education and centralized education among staff nurses" (2024). Dissertations. 44.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/44
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2024-08-20
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 30423871; ProQuest document ID: 2815177181. The author still retains copyright.