Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of a step by step non-simultaneous method for measuring somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and to determine reliability of a neurophysiologic evoked potential instrument, Bio-logic Evoked Potential System, on healthy, adult volunteers in a controlled environment. The neurophysiologic monitoring during anesthesia and surgery is used to optimize surgical outcomes and minimize neurologic morbidity. During surgery, the anesthetic regimen and subject variables can affect the electrical signals of neurophysiologic monitoring. The neurophysiologic instrument has an important role in the successful monitoring of the central nervous system. The research questions were: (1) What is the content validity of a research protocol that is a step by step method for measuring SSEPs (as assessed by a panel of experts)? (2) What is the precision of repeated measurements across five generators of SSEPs on the right and left median nerves using the Bio-logic Instrument? (3) What is the difference in the measurements of SSEPs on the median nerves between males and females? and (4) What is the relationship between the length of the arm from the wrist crease to Erb's point and the post-stimulus latency?
Sigma Membership
Beta Iota
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
Quantitative Research
Keywords:
Patient Monitoring, Patients on Anesthesia, Surgical Patient Care
Advisor
Marilyn Sawyer Sommers
Degree
PhD
Degree Grantor
University of Cincinnati
Degree Year
1998
Recommended Citation
Wilson, Wanda O., "Assessment of validity and reliability of a neurophysiologic evoked potential instrument" (2019). Dissertations. 70.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/70
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2019-12-10
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 9904001; ProQuest document ID: 304428526. The author still retains copyright.