Abstract
This qualitative descriptive study was designed to explore the cognitive strategies used by experienced nurses as they think about assessment findings on their assigned patients. As an essential component of nursing practice, clinical reasoning is used to assimilate information, analyze data, and make decisions regarding patient care. Changes in health care settings and patient acuity challenge nurses to make complex decisions under conditions of uncertainty and risk. With fewer expert nurses available to act as mentors, experienced nurses who are not yet experts must utilize varied reasoning strategies to care for acutely ill patients. Few studies of nurses' clinical reasoning have been conducted in a practice setting during actual patient care. Information processing theory provided the theoretical framework for the study.
Sigma Membership
Lambda Upsilon at-Large
Type
Dissertation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Descriptive/Correlational
Research Approach
Qualitative Research
Keywords:
Decision-Making, Problem-Solving, Clinical Reasoning
Advisor
Dorothy Lanuza
Second Advisor
Frank Hicks
Degree
PhD
Degree Grantor
Loyola University Chicago
Degree Year
2002
Recommended Citation
Simmons, Barbara, "Clinical reasoning in experienced nurses" (2023). Dissertations. 781.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/dissertations/781
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
None: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Date of Issue
2023-02-27
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
Description
This dissertation has also been disseminated through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Dissertation/thesis number: 3039305; ProQuest document ID: 251667215. The author still retains copyright.