Abstract
The noisy and brightly lit environment in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Phase I has the potential to agitate the arousing post anesthesia patient, delay recovering to an awake state, and could increase the need for analgesia medications. An experimental study was conducted in a community hospital PACU to determine the effects of a therapeutic environment (I.E. low lights and decreased noise) on analgesic requirements and satisfaction of patients recovering from surgery. Patients who had the quieter and darker environment did require less analgesic medications (reduced lighting p=0005; t= -21.54; mean difference -298.0249; reduced noise exposure p=0.005; t=-3.855; mean difference = -3.72773). Participants in the control group expressed dissatisfaction with the bright lights while the treatment group had no complaints. Noise levels, which were much more difficult to control, elicited some dissatisfaction from both groups.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Research Study
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Outcomes Research
Research Approach
Quantitative Research
Keywords:
Analgesics Administration and Dosage, Noise, Light, Post Anesthesia, Anesthesia Recovery, Postoperative Care
Recommended Citation
Kent, Donna C. and Timmons, Shirley Mae, "Therapeutic environmental effects on analgesic requirements in post anesthesia care unit phase I" (2024). General Submissions: Clinical Settings Materials. 1.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/gen_sub_csm/1
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Peer-review: Single Blind
Acquisition
Self-submission
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes