Abstract
Recently, Johnstone and Hutchinson (2015) called for abandoning the construct of "moral distress". For various reasons, they believe that too much attention is paid to it in the nursing literature, that the studies are not sound and that calling for action to relieve moral distress may be a moral imposition in the lives of our patients, families and colleagues.
There is one overriding concern about abandoning the construct of moral distress and that is that the phenomenon exists in the professional and personal lives of nurses despite the terminology. A construct is a manufactured concept with certain properties while the phenomenon of moral distress actually exists, independently of whether anyone studies or examines it. Whether the concept is called moral distress is another matter.
In the author's research the experience of nurses was that of the concept of moral regret or in a qualitative sense "looking back". A concept (not a construct) existed independently for many nurses - independently of the organization and of others. The author titled it moral regret or "looking back." It was a concept that so clearly existed and was experienced by so many nurses personally and professionally that the author made it one of her primary concepts of interest in nursing ethics. The "construct" of moral distress does exist also but little time has been spent studying the ethical aspects of it. This article will examine the ethical antecedents and consequences of the concept the author named moral regret and those that precede the constructs of moral distress and moral discomfort - possibly forms or degrees of ethical dysphoria.
Sigma Membership
Eta Pi
Type
Article
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Phenomenology
Research Approach
Qualitative Research
Keywords:
Ethical Issues, Ethics Research, Ethics, Nursing Education, Ethical Decision Making, Moral Distress
Recommended Citation
Wurzbach, Mary Ellen, "Moral regret - The experience of breaches of a nursing ideal" (2024). General Submissions: Nursing as Profession. 17.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/gen_sub_np/17
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Peer-review: Single Blind
Acquisition
Self-submission
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
