Abstract

Purpose: To accommodate the increased capacity of students while expanding their exposure to quality clinical encounters in a simulated environment.

Methods: This randomized-controlled study replaces 50% of clinical experience with either mannequin-based simulation or screen-based simulations. Comparison is made using validated standardized pediatric scenarios designed for mannequin-based and screen-based simulators. Participants include all on-line and on-campus pre-licensure nursing students during pediatric rotation. All on-line pre-licensure students are being exposed to the screen-based simulation, whereas the on-campus students are divided between screen-based simulation and mannequin-based simulation scenarios. The control group maintained current simulation schedule. Comparison of the pediatric HESI scores, clinical pass/fails and first-time NCLEX pass rates are the major outcomes. Demographics are included for all participants; satisfaction/usability of the technology is being collected for all those in the experimental groups.

Findings: Data collection is ongoing. Anecdotal information from faculty/students indicates students feel more confident when they go to clinicals and faculty believes the benefits of simulations are so noticeable, they intend to implement them every semester. Preliminary data analyses indicate an increase in the overall HESI score for the on-line students.

Value: Exposing our students to screen-based and mannequin-based simulations, education and competency will be enhanced.

Author Details

Judy LeFlore, PhD, RN, NNP-BC, CPNP-AC&PC, ANEF, FAAN; Mindi Anderson, PhD, ARNP, CPNP-PC, CNE, CHSE-A, ANEF; Jeanette Blankenship, MSN, RN; Daisha J. Cipher, PhD; Mary E. Mancini, RN, PhD, NE-BC, FAHA, ANEF, FAAN; Meagan Rogers, MSN, RN; Jennifer Roye, MSN, RN

Sigma Membership

Unknown

Lead Author Affiliation

International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL)

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Clinical Simulation, Screen-Based Simulation, Randomized-Controlled Study

Conference Name

INACSL Conference

Conference Host

International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning

Conference Location

Grapevine, Texas, USA

Conference Year

2016

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Using 21st century technology and innovation to increase simulation capacity

Grapevine, Texas, USA

Purpose: To accommodate the increased capacity of students while expanding their exposure to quality clinical encounters in a simulated environment.

Methods: This randomized-controlled study replaces 50% of clinical experience with either mannequin-based simulation or screen-based simulations. Comparison is made using validated standardized pediatric scenarios designed for mannequin-based and screen-based simulators. Participants include all on-line and on-campus pre-licensure nursing students during pediatric rotation. All on-line pre-licensure students are being exposed to the screen-based simulation, whereas the on-campus students are divided between screen-based simulation and mannequin-based simulation scenarios. The control group maintained current simulation schedule. Comparison of the pediatric HESI scores, clinical pass/fails and first-time NCLEX pass rates are the major outcomes. Demographics are included for all participants; satisfaction/usability of the technology is being collected for all those in the experimental groups.

Findings: Data collection is ongoing. Anecdotal information from faculty/students indicates students feel more confident when they go to clinicals and faculty believes the benefits of simulations are so noticeable, they intend to implement them every semester. Preliminary data analyses indicate an increase in the overall HESI score for the on-line students.

Value: Exposing our students to screen-based and mannequin-based simulations, education and competency will be enhanced.