Abstract

Purpose: The National League for Nursing in 2014 noted the lack of qualified faculty obstructs the preparation of new nurses (Nurse Educator Shortage Fact Sheet). One necessary role of faculty is addressing student failure in caring ways (Sitzman & Watson, 2014). The literature on using simulation to help prepare future nurse educators is scarce. Practicing difficult conversations within the context of simulation is one method to enhance role development. This presentation will explore the infusion of caring science approaches within a graduate nursing education simulation of student failure.

Methods: Two simulations, one clinical failure and one didactic failure, were created based on INACSL standards (Lioce et.al., 2015) incorporating a standardized "student" actor. In preparation, graduate students read and discussed articles on grade disputes, student rights, incivility/violence, and faculty vulnerability. They also reviewed a video about caring science. Pre-simulation, students reflected about their personal experiences receiving or providing feedback. Post-simulation, students again reflected on providing feedback and its application to future practice.

Findings: Analysis of student reflections identified several themes: demonstration of caring behaviors; creating appropriate environment; educator accountability; and internal feelings. Anecdotal comments supported the importance of this learning experience. Additional data will be collected from course evaluation comments.

Implications: Role development of future nurse educators can be assisted with the use of strategically designed simulations. It is hoped that, as new faculty, graduates will shape their interactions with failing students using caring science approaches.

Author Details

Diane S. Aschenbrenner, MS, RN, CHSE; Roxanne Moran, PhD, RN, CNE

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Lead Author Affiliation

International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL)

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Simulation, Graduate Nursing Students, Caring, Communication, Failing Students

Conference Name

INACSL Conference 2017

Conference Host

INACSL

Conference Location

Washington, D.C., USA

Conference Year

2017

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Caring communication with failing students: A new simulation application for graduate education

Washington, D.C., USA

Purpose: The National League for Nursing in 2014 noted the lack of qualified faculty obstructs the preparation of new nurses (Nurse Educator Shortage Fact Sheet). One necessary role of faculty is addressing student failure in caring ways (Sitzman & Watson, 2014). The literature on using simulation to help prepare future nurse educators is scarce. Practicing difficult conversations within the context of simulation is one method to enhance role development. This presentation will explore the infusion of caring science approaches within a graduate nursing education simulation of student failure.

Methods: Two simulations, one clinical failure and one didactic failure, were created based on INACSL standards (Lioce et.al., 2015) incorporating a standardized "student" actor. In preparation, graduate students read and discussed articles on grade disputes, student rights, incivility/violence, and faculty vulnerability. They also reviewed a video about caring science. Pre-simulation, students reflected about their personal experiences receiving or providing feedback. Post-simulation, students again reflected on providing feedback and its application to future practice.

Findings: Analysis of student reflections identified several themes: demonstration of caring behaviors; creating appropriate environment; educator accountability; and internal feelings. Anecdotal comments supported the importance of this learning experience. Additional data will be collected from course evaluation comments.

Implications: Role development of future nurse educators can be assisted with the use of strategically designed simulations. It is hoped that, as new faculty, graduates will shape their interactions with failing students using caring science approaches.