Abstract
Purpose: Improving patient satisfaction, decreasing left without being seen rates, and improving ED throughput were the objectives for embarking on this journey to streamline treatment of ESI 4 and 5 patients.
Design: This quality assurance project was implemented by the ED Throughput Team based on current evidence.
Setting: A private, not-for-profit Community Hospital located in the urban southeastern part of the United States. This EBP project was conducted in a 58 bed ED that provides care for approximately 70,000 patients per year.
Participants/Subjects: All patients assigned an ESI level 4 or 5 were included and all ED staff members contributed to and followed the updated processes for care delivery.
Methods: The current process for managing ESI 4 and 5 patients was mapped by the ED Throughput team. Gaps were identified in flow and improvements implemented including First Nurse assessment and triage bypass, relocation of ESI 4 and 5 waiting area, negotiation of patient placement between Charge RN and Providers, and utilization of consistent staff in designated area. Process changes were reviewed at staff meetings, through written education, and through direct observation of performance with remediation for missed opportunities.
Results/Outcomes: During the 12-month implementation of this project, door-to-discharge times for ESI 4 and 5 patients was reduced by 16 minutes, from 128.23 minutes to 112.7 minutes. Patient satisfaction was improved from a mean score of 83.9 to 85.6. LWBS rates decreased from 3.0% to 2.0%.
Implications: By improving flow for the ESI 4 and 5 patients, we were able to reduce our door-to-discharge times, decrease our wait times and decrease LWBS rates. Relocating the waiting area from the main lobby to a separate space improved patient perception and impacted a rise in mean patient satisfaction scores. Utilizing the First Nurse to rapidly assess patients and sort them to the correct treatment area was critical to the success of this project. Staff education and buy-in to making incremental changes in processes made this project sustainable.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Throughput, Emergency Department, Left Without Being Seen (LWBS)
Recommended Citation
Stanfield, Laura; Hunt, Debbie; Johnson, Tiffany; Gillispie, Collyn; Moyer, Greg; and Holt, Anna, "Time matters! Improve satisfaction, decrease LWBS, and enhance throughput" (2019). General Submissions: Presenations (Oral and Poster). 130.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/gen_sub_presentations/2018/posters/130
Conference Name
Emergency Nursing 2018
Conference Host
Emergency Nurses Association
Conference Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Conference Year
2018
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Time matters! Improve satisfaction, decrease LWBS, and enhance throughput
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Purpose: Improving patient satisfaction, decreasing left without being seen rates, and improving ED throughput were the objectives for embarking on this journey to streamline treatment of ESI 4 and 5 patients.
Design: This quality assurance project was implemented by the ED Throughput Team based on current evidence.
Setting: A private, not-for-profit Community Hospital located in the urban southeastern part of the United States. This EBP project was conducted in a 58 bed ED that provides care for approximately 70,000 patients per year.
Participants/Subjects: All patients assigned an ESI level 4 or 5 were included and all ED staff members contributed to and followed the updated processes for care delivery.
Methods: The current process for managing ESI 4 and 5 patients was mapped by the ED Throughput team. Gaps were identified in flow and improvements implemented including First Nurse assessment and triage bypass, relocation of ESI 4 and 5 waiting area, negotiation of patient placement between Charge RN and Providers, and utilization of consistent staff in designated area. Process changes were reviewed at staff meetings, through written education, and through direct observation of performance with remediation for missed opportunities.
Results/Outcomes: During the 12-month implementation of this project, door-to-discharge times for ESI 4 and 5 patients was reduced by 16 minutes, from 128.23 minutes to 112.7 minutes. Patient satisfaction was improved from a mean score of 83.9 to 85.6. LWBS rates decreased from 3.0% to 2.0%.
Implications: By improving flow for the ESI 4 and 5 patients, we were able to reduce our door-to-discharge times, decrease our wait times and decrease LWBS rates. Relocating the waiting area from the main lobby to a separate space improved patient perception and impacted a rise in mean patient satisfaction scores. Utilizing the First Nurse to rapidly assess patients and sort them to the correct treatment area was critical to the success of this project. Staff education and buy-in to making incremental changes in processes made this project sustainable.