Abstract
Purpose: The health system has a stated vision "to create 15,000 problem solvers" through implementation of a lean daily management system, including process improvement tools to address safety issues. Baseline Culture of Safety survey data of Emergency Department (ED) staff also indicate opportunity to improve overall perception of safety and provide education on error prevention. The objective of this evidence based practice (EBP) quality improvement project was to educate ED staff on utilization of the A3 tool to identify and address safety concerns in the ED and improve overall perception of safety.
Design: The Johns Hopkins Nursing EBP Model was used and literature review performed using databases Medline and PubMed, with key words "Lean; Lean thinking, interventions, safety interventions; quality improvement; A3." Seventeen articles reviewed, nine were good quality to support the EBP quality improvement project. Literature defines LEAN as operating philosophies and methods to create maximum value by reducing waste and waits. LEAN culture views problems as opportunities to improve processes. LEAN problem-solving steps are: identifying the problem, understanding current state, developing ideal state, performing a root cause analysis, determining countermeasures, creating an implementation plan, and checking results to confirm effect.
Setting: 141-bed community hospital ED (approximately 30,000 annual visits), in south central Pennsylvania. Participants/Subjects: All ED staff participated.
Methods: Experienced ED RN's rapidly use the nursing process: assessment, diagnoses, planning, implementing and evaluating, to provide safe patient care. Nurses are trained clinical problem solvers. Lives depend on their skills. When nurses are faced with process-related problems, they problem solve, using tools from their training. Process problem-solving requires a more structured, continuous improvement approach closely resembling the nursing process. A3 problem solving, first employed at Toyota, is based on principles of Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA), the manufacturing version of the nursing process. To engage nursing in this problem-solving process, ED staff was educated on LEAN methodology and the A3 tool. Daily safety huddles were conducted where exposure and education to A3 thinking was introduced and role-modeled. Opportunities to improve safety were identified by front-line staff, A3 thinking applied, and standard work developed. Opportunities identified ranged from immediate safety issues to everyday process problems which were barriers to providing safe care. To measure success, the number of A3's in progress throughout the ED, including those led by front-line staff were tracked. Additionally, the AHRQ Culture of Safety survey was administered to the ED as part of the annual employee engagement assessment.
Results/Outcomes: AHRQ Culture of Safety ED survey results from 2016 to 2017 indicate a 12.8% improvement in rating of overall perception of patient safety, and 19.1% improvement in procedures and systems are good at preventing errors. In addition, 4 group A3's have been completed in the ED to address safety issues, and 2 additional A3's are in progress being led by front line staff.
Implications: LEAN activities increase safety awareness among front-line staff and overall perception of safety culture. Evidence suggests utilizing lean interventions, including A3 thinking, promotes staff engagement in identifying and solving process problems, and developing standard work to sustain process changes to improve patient safety.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Emergency Department, A3, Daily Management System
Recommended Citation
Reedy, Sandra, "Using A3 thinking to address safety issues in the ED" (2019). General Submissions: Presenations (Oral and Poster). 149.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/gen_sub_presentations/2018/posters/149
Conference Name
Emergency Nursing 2018
Conference Host
Emergency Nurses Association
Conference Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Conference Year
2018
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Using A3 thinking to address safety issues in the ED
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
Purpose: The health system has a stated vision "to create 15,000 problem solvers" through implementation of a lean daily management system, including process improvement tools to address safety issues. Baseline Culture of Safety survey data of Emergency Department (ED) staff also indicate opportunity to improve overall perception of safety and provide education on error prevention. The objective of this evidence based practice (EBP) quality improvement project was to educate ED staff on utilization of the A3 tool to identify and address safety concerns in the ED and improve overall perception of safety.
Design: The Johns Hopkins Nursing EBP Model was used and literature review performed using databases Medline and PubMed, with key words "Lean; Lean thinking, interventions, safety interventions; quality improvement; A3." Seventeen articles reviewed, nine were good quality to support the EBP quality improvement project. Literature defines LEAN as operating philosophies and methods to create maximum value by reducing waste and waits. LEAN culture views problems as opportunities to improve processes. LEAN problem-solving steps are: identifying the problem, understanding current state, developing ideal state, performing a root cause analysis, determining countermeasures, creating an implementation plan, and checking results to confirm effect.
Setting: 141-bed community hospital ED (approximately 30,000 annual visits), in south central Pennsylvania. Participants/Subjects: All ED staff participated.
Methods: Experienced ED RN's rapidly use the nursing process: assessment, diagnoses, planning, implementing and evaluating, to provide safe patient care. Nurses are trained clinical problem solvers. Lives depend on their skills. When nurses are faced with process-related problems, they problem solve, using tools from their training. Process problem-solving requires a more structured, continuous improvement approach closely resembling the nursing process. A3 problem solving, first employed at Toyota, is based on principles of Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA), the manufacturing version of the nursing process. To engage nursing in this problem-solving process, ED staff was educated on LEAN methodology and the A3 tool. Daily safety huddles were conducted where exposure and education to A3 thinking was introduced and role-modeled. Opportunities to improve safety were identified by front-line staff, A3 thinking applied, and standard work developed. Opportunities identified ranged from immediate safety issues to everyday process problems which were barriers to providing safe care. To measure success, the number of A3's in progress throughout the ED, including those led by front-line staff were tracked. Additionally, the AHRQ Culture of Safety survey was administered to the ED as part of the annual employee engagement assessment.
Results/Outcomes: AHRQ Culture of Safety ED survey results from 2016 to 2017 indicate a 12.8% improvement in rating of overall perception of patient safety, and 19.1% improvement in procedures and systems are good at preventing errors. In addition, 4 group A3's have been completed in the ED to address safety issues, and 2 additional A3's are in progress being led by front line staff.
Implications: LEAN activities increase safety awareness among front-line staff and overall perception of safety culture. Evidence suggests utilizing lean interventions, including A3 thinking, promotes staff engagement in identifying and solving process problems, and developing standard work to sustain process changes to improve patient safety.