Abstract

Quality questions enable the nursing professional development (NPD) practitioner to evaluate knowledge, assess critical thinking and obtain data. Best practices have been identified for writing meaningful multiple-choice questions, developing surveys, using audience response systems and asking critical thinking questions. General guidelines for question development regardless of the situation will be discussed in a practical checklist format. Strategies for creating quality stems and options augment the general principles for constructing multiple choice questions. A creative alternative for true false questions, forced choice, will be introduced. Participants will critique and revise questions individually and in small group work. The general principles are used for all situations, but questions are written differently depending on the application or situation. A comparison of best practices for writing questions for computer based learning, competency assessment, evaluation and critical thinking will be made. Techniques for writing higher level questions and correcting common errors will be practiced during partner work. Survey questions, in addition to general principles, emphasize elements related to format, clarity, brevity, and style to increase response rate and obtain usable data. Audience response applications can be used to assess understanding in the moment, get feedback or recognize and anonymously share the participant’s views. Faculty training improves the quality of questions and reduces item writing flaws (Abdulghani et al., 2015, p. 4).

Author Details

Deborah Jayne Laughlin, MSN, RN-BC; Rosemarie Nedeau-Cayo, MSN, RN-BC

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Presentation-Oral Standard Event

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Competency Management, Standardized Competency System, Nursing Competencies

Conference Name

2019 ANPD Annual Convention

Conference Host

Association for Nursing Professional Development (ANPD)

Conference Location

Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Conference Year

2019

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Slide Presentation

Share

COinS
 

Developing Quality Questions for Various Applications

Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Quality questions enable the nursing professional development (NPD) practitioner to evaluate knowledge, assess critical thinking and obtain data. Best practices have been identified for writing meaningful multiple-choice questions, developing surveys, using audience response systems and asking critical thinking questions. General guidelines for question development regardless of the situation will be discussed in a practical checklist format. Strategies for creating quality stems and options augment the general principles for constructing multiple choice questions. A creative alternative for true false questions, forced choice, will be introduced. Participants will critique and revise questions individually and in small group work. The general principles are used for all situations, but questions are written differently depending on the application or situation. A comparison of best practices for writing questions for computer based learning, competency assessment, evaluation and critical thinking will be made. Techniques for writing higher level questions and correcting common errors will be practiced during partner work. Survey questions, in addition to general principles, emphasize elements related to format, clarity, brevity, and style to increase response rate and obtain usable data. Audience response applications can be used to assess understanding in the moment, get feedback or recognize and anonymously share the participant’s views. Faculty training improves the quality of questions and reduces item writing flaws (Abdulghani et al., 2015, p. 4).