Abstract
Bupivacaine is the most common local anesthetic used in spinals for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures, despite its extended duration (3-9 hours). Most TKA's can be completed in approximately 60-90 minutes and most THAs in 60-120 minutes. This leaves TKA and THA patients largely immobile for much longer than needed when the spinal anesthesia duration exceeds surgical time. Prolonged immobility leads to longer time in PACU, slower discharge times, and increased cost. Mepivacaine may be an excellent alternative for these ambulatory procedures, due to its more reasonable duration of 90-150 minutes, but most providers fear using it due to its association with transient neurologic symptoms (TNS). The purpose of this project is to determine if Mepivacaine is superior to Bupivacaine in terms of motor recovery, earlier discharge, and to examine the incidence of TNS with Mepivacaine use.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
DNP Capstone Project
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Other
Research Approach
Translational Research/Evidence-based Practice
Keywords:
Mepivacaine, Bupivacaine, Neuraxial, Spinal Compressions, Anesthesia, Transient Neurologic Symptoms, Transient Radicular Irritation
Advisor
Pecka, Shannon
Degree
Doctoral-Other
Degree Grantor
Bryan College of Health Sciences
Degree Year
2022
Recommended Citation
Backman, Grant M., "Mepivacaine and bupivacaine spinal comparisons for motor function return, discharge time, and transient neurologic symptoms: An evidence based practice analysis" (2024). Group: Bryan College of Health Sciences Doctor of Nurse Anesthesia Practice (DNAP) Collection. 57.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/group_bryan_dnap/57
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Faculty Approved: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes