Abstract
Objective: The aim of this integrative review is to provide current evidence along with recommendations for practice regarding the effects of spontaneous and pressure support ventilation with the use of a Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)in the adult population. Emphasis has been placed on the incidence of leak and gastric insufflation and the impact ventilation holds on the perioperative period.
Methods: A search of the electronic databases CINAHL complete, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library was performed. Thirteen articles published from 1994-2022 were critically appraised for reliability.
Results and Conclusion: Evidence suggests that the use of pressure support ventilation, inclusive in terms of positive pressure ventilation, is as safe and effective as spontaneous ventilation when conducted through an LMA, with a comparative incidence of leak and gastric insufflation to an ETT, while optimizing ventilatory parameters.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Other Graduate Paper
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Literature Review
Research Approach
Translational Research/Evidence-based Practice
Keywords:
Laryngeal Mask Airway, Ventilation, Gastric Insufflation, Leak Pressure, Respitory Hemodynamics
Advisor
Chandler, Holly
Degree
Doctoral-Other
Degree Grantor
Bryan College of Health Sciences
Degree Year
2023
Recommended Citation
Brink, Jordan, "The use of spontaneous vs. pressure support ventilation with a laryngeal mask airway: An integrative review" (2024). Group: Bryan College of Health Sciences Doctor of Nurse Anesthesia Practice (DNAP) Collection. 6.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/group_bryan_dnap/6
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Faculty Approved: Degree-based Submission
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Full Text of Presentation
wf_yes
