Abstract
Purpose: Workplace bullying is a major impediment to successful team relationships and job satisfaction in workplace environments, contributing to individual and interpersonal stress, tension, and burnout. Additionally, bullying affects worker productivity, especially in workplaces concerned with healthcare and healthcare education (Abe et al., 2010; Allan et al., 2009; Hutchinson et al., 2006; Randle, 2003). Authors investigated the psychometric properties of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) using Rasch Analysis in the context of workplace bullying. Catastrophization is a 'tendency to focus on and exaggerate the threat value of painful stimuli and negatively evaluate (one's) own ability to deal with pain' (Keefe et al., 2002, p. 2). Methods: One hundred fifty-four nursing faculty from Midwest US universities participated in this study. Bullying catastrophization was measured using the PCS, a 13-item instrument with items scored from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (All the time). Results: Data were analyzed using Rasch Analysis (i.e., Rating Scale Model), which produces an interval scale that arranges items according to how likely they are to be endorsed (i.e., item difficulty). Rasch Analysis is also used to diagnose problematic items in a survey. Person/Item Separation and Person/Item Reliability were high (i.e., > 1.00 and > .84, respectively; Coefficient Alpha = .97). The response scale from 0 to 4 was used as expected, with each step logit position increasing across the theta continuum. Finally, items 7, 10, 11, and 13 had high standardized fit statistics (i.e., > + 1.96). Conclusion: Examining the psychometric properties of the PCS in the context of workplace bullying supports utilization of a brief measure to gauge workplace climate as related to bullying in support of its diagnosis and potentially remedying problems before they become major impediments to productivity and individual well-being.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Lead Author Affiliation
Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Psychometrics/Measurement, Workplace Bullying, Rasch Analysis
Recommended Citation
Karpinski, Aryn C.; Meyers, Timothy W.; Dzurec, Laura Cox; Bromley, Gail E.; and Fitzgerald, Shawn M., "Rasch analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the context of workplace bullying for a sample of nursing faculty from Midwest U.S. universities" (2012). INRC (Congress). 128.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2012/presentations_2012/128
Conference Name
23rd International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Brisbane, Australia
Conference Year
2012
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Rasch analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in the context of workplace bullying for a sample of nursing faculty from Midwest U.S. universities
Brisbane, Australia
Purpose: Workplace bullying is a major impediment to successful team relationships and job satisfaction in workplace environments, contributing to individual and interpersonal stress, tension, and burnout. Additionally, bullying affects worker productivity, especially in workplaces concerned with healthcare and healthcare education (Abe et al., 2010; Allan et al., 2009; Hutchinson et al., 2006; Randle, 2003). Authors investigated the psychometric properties of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) using Rasch Analysis in the context of workplace bullying. Catastrophization is a 'tendency to focus on and exaggerate the threat value of painful stimuli and negatively evaluate (one's) own ability to deal with pain' (Keefe et al., 2002, p. 2). Methods: One hundred fifty-four nursing faculty from Midwest US universities participated in this study. Bullying catastrophization was measured using the PCS, a 13-item instrument with items scored from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (All the time). Results: Data were analyzed using Rasch Analysis (i.e., Rating Scale Model), which produces an interval scale that arranges items according to how likely they are to be endorsed (i.e., item difficulty). Rasch Analysis is also used to diagnose problematic items in a survey. Person/Item Separation and Person/Item Reliability were high (i.e., > 1.00 and > .84, respectively; Coefficient Alpha = .97). The response scale from 0 to 4 was used as expected, with each step logit position increasing across the theta continuum. Finally, items 7, 10, 11, and 13 had high standardized fit statistics (i.e., > + 1.96). Conclusion: Examining the psychometric properties of the PCS in the context of workplace bullying supports utilization of a brief measure to gauge workplace climate as related to bullying in support of its diagnosis and potentially remedying problems before they become major impediments to productivity and individual well-being.