Abstract
Purpose: Articles on pediatric behavioral scales were reviewed to elucidate usage of pain assessment tools in clinical practice. Methods: A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SODL, CEPS and master thesis databases for systematic reviews published from 2000 to 2011 using the following search terms: pain, child, children, childhood, systematic review, and instrument. A total of 112 articles were identified. 7 articles on child pain assessment instrument met the inclusion criteria. Results: Pediatric pain assessment scales can be either observational scales or self-reported measure. 20 articles on observational scales were identified. CHEOPS, FLACC, PPPM, COMFORT, POCIS scales were suggested to be used in hospitalized, post-operative, critical care, and burn patients. A total of 34 single-item self-report measures were found. The most often used scale for research purposes were Pieces of hurt tool, FPS, Oucher, Wong-Baker FACES pain score, and VAS. The scales mentioned above were reliable, effective, and can be utilized in different types of diseases. Conclusion: Pain is subjective. In order to accurately assess pain in pediatric population, behavioral scales, self-report measure, and physiologic indicators should be incorporated. In pediatric population pain could not be well expressed due to immature cognition. Self-report measure is not a reliable tool when used in patients less than 6-year-old. Pain will be assessed more accurately when self-report measure is utilized in combination with a reliable and effective behavioral observation scale. In the future, research should be directed to comparison of the physiologic indicators with observational scales vs self-report measure to validate the effectiveness of different scales.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Systematic Review
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Pain, Children, Instrument
Recommended Citation
Yang, Pei-Hsin and Chao, Kuo-Li, "Systematic literature review of pediatric pain measures" (2012). INRC (Congress). 179.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2012/presentations_2012/179
Conference Name
23rd International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Brisbane, Australia
Conference Year
2012
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Systematic literature review of pediatric pain measures
Brisbane, Australia
Purpose: Articles on pediatric behavioral scales were reviewed to elucidate usage of pain assessment tools in clinical practice. Methods: A literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SODL, CEPS and master thesis databases for systematic reviews published from 2000 to 2011 using the following search terms: pain, child, children, childhood, systematic review, and instrument. A total of 112 articles were identified. 7 articles on child pain assessment instrument met the inclusion criteria. Results: Pediatric pain assessment scales can be either observational scales or self-reported measure. 20 articles on observational scales were identified. CHEOPS, FLACC, PPPM, COMFORT, POCIS scales were suggested to be used in hospitalized, post-operative, critical care, and burn patients. A total of 34 single-item self-report measures were found. The most often used scale for research purposes were Pieces of hurt tool, FPS, Oucher, Wong-Baker FACES pain score, and VAS. The scales mentioned above were reliable, effective, and can be utilized in different types of diseases. Conclusion: Pain is subjective. In order to accurately assess pain in pediatric population, behavioral scales, self-report measure, and physiologic indicators should be incorporated. In pediatric population pain could not be well expressed due to immature cognition. Self-report measure is not a reliable tool when used in patients less than 6-year-old. Pain will be assessed more accurately when self-report measure is utilized in combination with a reliable and effective behavioral observation scale. In the future, research should be directed to comparison of the physiologic indicators with observational scales vs self-report measure to validate the effectiveness of different scales.