Abstract
Purpose: To help stakeholders improve the selection process of nurse preceptors for senior baccalaureate nursing students, they were asked to rate the importance of preceptor qualities/characteristics.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a large tertiary hospital and at an affiliated university nursing school in an urban Canadian city. Subjects (n=166) included hospital Registered Nurses (RNs) (with or without preceptor experience), educators, and administrators, as well as university faculty and students. In the instrument development phase of a larger preceptor selection study, representatives of the stakeholder groups were asked to identify preceptor issues. From a content analysis of the written responses, 24 preceptor qualities/characteristics emerged. Study subjects rated the 24 qualities/characteristics on a 0-100 rating scale (100 = the highest possible importance rating).
Results: Mean ratings were used to derive the rankings for the 24 qualities/characteristics. The top 10 rankings (1 = most important) revealed the blending of two major roles: (1) as a competent, confident , practicing RN who communicates effectively, thinks critically, and is passionate about nursing, and (2) as an enthusiastic clinical teacher who is empathetic to students, identifies educational needs and facilitates learning, provides timely feedback, and promotes student autonomy. The assessment of the reliability data (n = 22 subjects) indicated that, at both times (ratings completed 5-7 days apart), eight of the 10 highest ranked qualities/characteristics fell within the 10 most important qualities/characteristics in the original study. Two other means were ranked 11th (one at Time 1 and one at Time 2).
Conclusion: Awareness and understanding of these rankings can help each stakeholder group in designing strategies to improve preceptor selection and nurture preceptor development: specifically, those involved in selecting preceptors (RNs/preceptors, educators, administrators), and educators (agency and university) responsible for providing preceptor and/or student education and supporting preceptorship within health agencies or educational institutions.
Sigma Membership
Unknown
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
Cross-Sectional
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Preceptor Selection, Preceptorship, Undergraduate Nursing Education
Recommended Citation
Mohide, E. Ann; Geradrdi, Olivia; Norman, Dianne; Cavalieri, Vanessa; McKey, Colleen A.; Jennings, Barbara; Akhtar-Danesh, Noori; and Seidlitz, Wendy, "Selecting nurse preceptors: What qualities and characteristics should be considered?" (2012). INRC (Congress). 227.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2012/presentations_2012/227
Conference Name
23rd International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Brisbane, Australia
Conference Year
2012
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Selecting nurse preceptors: What qualities and characteristics should be considered?
Brisbane, Australia
Purpose: To help stakeholders improve the selection process of nurse preceptors for senior baccalaureate nursing students, they were asked to rate the importance of preceptor qualities/characteristics.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a large tertiary hospital and at an affiliated university nursing school in an urban Canadian city. Subjects (n=166) included hospital Registered Nurses (RNs) (with or without preceptor experience), educators, and administrators, as well as university faculty and students. In the instrument development phase of a larger preceptor selection study, representatives of the stakeholder groups were asked to identify preceptor issues. From a content analysis of the written responses, 24 preceptor qualities/characteristics emerged. Study subjects rated the 24 qualities/characteristics on a 0-100 rating scale (100 = the highest possible importance rating).
Results: Mean ratings were used to derive the rankings for the 24 qualities/characteristics. The top 10 rankings (1 = most important) revealed the blending of two major roles: (1) as a competent, confident , practicing RN who communicates effectively, thinks critically, and is passionate about nursing, and (2) as an enthusiastic clinical teacher who is empathetic to students, identifies educational needs and facilitates learning, provides timely feedback, and promotes student autonomy. The assessment of the reliability data (n = 22 subjects) indicated that, at both times (ratings completed 5-7 days apart), eight of the 10 highest ranked qualities/characteristics fell within the 10 most important qualities/characteristics in the original study. Two other means were ranked 11th (one at Time 1 and one at Time 2).
Conclusion: Awareness and understanding of these rankings can help each stakeholder group in designing strategies to improve preceptor selection and nurture preceptor development: specifically, those involved in selecting preceptors (RNs/preceptors, educators, administrators), and educators (agency and university) responsible for providing preceptor and/or student education and supporting preceptorship within health agencies or educational institutions.