Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure informal RN-to-RN peer review defined as collegial communication about the quality of nursing care at the work-unit level. In multiple studies, the top-ranked factor related to quality of nursing care is working with other nurses who are clinically competent. Nurses experience psychological or moral distress when they do not feel competent or when colleagues' nursing practice is perceived as suboptimal. Methods: We used a survey design with cluster sampling of 28 hospital and ambulatory care units (n = 541 respondents). We modified Hughes's Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale and collected qualitative data through open-ended questions and comment boxes. A chi-squared test was used to compare responses against nurse characteristics. Results: Results were compared with existing patient safety and satisfaction data. There were no correlation with patient safety or patient satisfaction. Misunderstandings about the meaning of peer review were evident. Open-ended comments revealed barriers to peer review: fear of retribution, language barriers and lack of professionalism. Conclusion: Nurses need clarification of peer review. Issues with common language in a professional environment need to be addressed. Nurses can learn collaboration from each other's cultures.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
quality of nursing care, communication, peer review
Recommended Citation
Pfeiffer, Judith A.; Deetz, Jill; Berry, Elise L.; and Wickline, Mary A., "RN-to-RN Peer Review on Clinical Units" (2012). INRC (Congress). 23.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2012/presentations_2012/23
Conference Name
23rd International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Brisbane, Australia
Conference Year
2012
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
RN-to-RN Peer Review on Clinical Units
Brisbane, Australia
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure informal RN-to-RN peer review defined as collegial communication about the quality of nursing care at the work-unit level. In multiple studies, the top-ranked factor related to quality of nursing care is working with other nurses who are clinically competent. Nurses experience psychological or moral distress when they do not feel competent or when colleagues' nursing practice is perceived as suboptimal. Methods: We used a survey design with cluster sampling of 28 hospital and ambulatory care units (n = 541 respondents). We modified Hughes's Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale and collected qualitative data through open-ended questions and comment boxes. A chi-squared test was used to compare responses against nurse characteristics. Results: Results were compared with existing patient safety and satisfaction data. There were no correlation with patient safety or patient satisfaction. Misunderstandings about the meaning of peer review were evident. Open-ended comments revealed barriers to peer review: fear of retribution, language barriers and lack of professionalism. Conclusion: Nurses need clarification of peer review. Issues with common language in a professional environment need to be addressed. Nurses can learn collaboration from each other's cultures.