Abstract
Purpose: Early detection of dysphagia in acute stroke is critical as it allows for immediate intervention, thereby reducing mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalization, and healthcare costs. These findings have led to the recommendation to screen swallowing ability in all acute stroke patients, regardless of stroke severity. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to determine the evidence-based validity of dysphagia screening items using instrumental evaluation as the reference standard. Methods: Four databases from 1985 through March, 2011 were searched using the terms cerebrovascular disease, stroke deglutition disorders, and dysphagia. Eligibility criteria were: homogeneous stroke population, comparison to instrumental examination, clinical examination without equipment, outcome measures of dysphagia and aspiration, and validity for screening items reported or able to be calculated. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated for methodological rigor. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive capabilities were calculated for each item. Results: Total source documents numbered 832; 86 were reviewed in full, and 16 met inclusion criteria. Study quality was variable. Testing swallowing, generally with water, was most common. Swallowing protocols, nor sensitivity and specificity were consistent across studies. Non-swallowing behaviors were also identified as predictive of aspiration. Conclusion: Numerous behaviors were identified that were associated with aspiration. The best combination of non-swallowing and swallowing items as well as the best swallowing protocol remains unclear. Findings of this review will assist in development of valid clinical screening instruments that can be used by nurses to identify dysphagia among stroke patients.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Dysphagia screening, Stroke, Validity
Recommended Citation
Willson, Pamela, "Valid Items for Screening Dysphagia Risk in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review" (2012). INRC (Congress). 51.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2012/presentations_2012/51
Conference Name
23rd International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Brisbane, Australia
Conference Year
2012
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Valid Items for Screening Dysphagia Risk in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review
Brisbane, Australia
Purpose: Early detection of dysphagia in acute stroke is critical as it allows for immediate intervention, thereby reducing mortality, morbidity, length of hospitalization, and healthcare costs. These findings have led to the recommendation to screen swallowing ability in all acute stroke patients, regardless of stroke severity. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to determine the evidence-based validity of dysphagia screening items using instrumental evaluation as the reference standard. Methods: Four databases from 1985 through March, 2011 were searched using the terms cerebrovascular disease, stroke deglutition disorders, and dysphagia. Eligibility criteria were: homogeneous stroke population, comparison to instrumental examination, clinical examination without equipment, outcome measures of dysphagia and aspiration, and validity for screening items reported or able to be calculated. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated for methodological rigor. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive capabilities were calculated for each item. Results: Total source documents numbered 832; 86 were reviewed in full, and 16 met inclusion criteria. Study quality was variable. Testing swallowing, generally with water, was most common. Swallowing protocols, nor sensitivity and specificity were consistent across studies. Non-swallowing behaviors were also identified as predictive of aspiration. Conclusion: Numerous behaviors were identified that were associated with aspiration. The best combination of non-swallowing and swallowing items as well as the best swallowing protocol remains unclear. Findings of this review will assist in development of valid clinical screening instruments that can be used by nurses to identify dysphagia among stroke patients.
