Abstract
Session presented on: Friday, July 26, 2013:
Purpose: Increased availability of treatment interventions and changing technology has increased demand for health care while the global financial crisis has increased calls for cost reduction. The pressure on nurse leaders to reduce staffing costs is significant. This research assessed the economic impact of increased nurse staffing on health outcomes in adult teaching hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. It provides evidence that is relevant to policy development.
Methods: This longitudinal study involved the retrospective analysis of a cohort of multi-day stay patients admitted to adult teaching hospitals. Hospital morbidity and staffing data were used to analyse nursing-sensitive outcomes pre and post implementation of improved nurse staffing. Data comprised 22 months prior to implementation of the improved staffing (pre-implementation), 6 months transition and 22 months following implementation of the improved staffing (post-implementation). Increased nurse staffing following implementation of the staffing method constituted the cost of the intervention.
Results: The number of nursing-sensitive outcomes was 1,357 less than expected post implementation and included 155 fewer 'failure to rescue' events. The 1,202 other nursing-sensitive outcomes were also prevented and one outcome showed an increase of 493. Life years gained (based on the failure to rescue events prevented) was 1,088. The cost per life year gained was AUD$8,907.
Conclusion: Improvements in nurse staffing method were cost-effective when compared with interventions thresholds used in Australia. Furthermore, these results meet cost-effectiveness thresholds of the United States of America, the United Kingdom and Sweden suggesting broader application that that of Australia. These results are supportive of similar findings in the literature and suggest increasing nurse staffing is a cost-effective strategy. Nurse leaders may utilise these findings to influence policy development and reduce demands for staffing reductions.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Patient Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness, Staffing
Recommended Citation
Twigg, Diane Esma and Duffield, Christine M., "Are there economic benefits from increased nursing staffing in acute hospitals?" (2013). INRC (Congress). 117.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2013/presentations_2013/117
Conference Name
24th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Prague, Czech Republic
Conference Year
2013
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Are there economic benefits from increased nursing staffing in acute hospitals?
Prague, Czech Republic
Session presented on: Friday, July 26, 2013:
Purpose: Increased availability of treatment interventions and changing technology has increased demand for health care while the global financial crisis has increased calls for cost reduction. The pressure on nurse leaders to reduce staffing costs is significant. This research assessed the economic impact of increased nurse staffing on health outcomes in adult teaching hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. It provides evidence that is relevant to policy development.
Methods: This longitudinal study involved the retrospective analysis of a cohort of multi-day stay patients admitted to adult teaching hospitals. Hospital morbidity and staffing data were used to analyse nursing-sensitive outcomes pre and post implementation of improved nurse staffing. Data comprised 22 months prior to implementation of the improved staffing (pre-implementation), 6 months transition and 22 months following implementation of the improved staffing (post-implementation). Increased nurse staffing following implementation of the staffing method constituted the cost of the intervention.
Results: The number of nursing-sensitive outcomes was 1,357 less than expected post implementation and included 155 fewer 'failure to rescue' events. The 1,202 other nursing-sensitive outcomes were also prevented and one outcome showed an increase of 493. Life years gained (based on the failure to rescue events prevented) was 1,088. The cost per life year gained was AUD$8,907.
Conclusion: Improvements in nurse staffing method were cost-effective when compared with interventions thresholds used in Australia. Furthermore, these results meet cost-effectiveness thresholds of the United States of America, the United Kingdom and Sweden suggesting broader application that that of Australia. These results are supportive of similar findings in the literature and suggest increasing nurse staffing is a cost-effective strategy. Nurse leaders may utilise these findings to influence policy development and reduce demands for staffing reductions.