Abstract
Session presented on: Monday, July 22, 2013:
Purpose: To increase the understanding and the effect of specific predisposing, enabling and need variables on access to liver transplantation.
Methods: Kaplan Meir survival and Cox Proportional Hazard regression analyses were conducted using secondary data from the US Scientific Research Transplant Registry (SRTR), managed by the Organ Procurement Transplant Network and the United Network of Organ Sharing that included 32,566 patients. Database United States Scientific Research Transplant Registry (SRTR), with input from the US federally designated Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN).
Population: Individuals wait-listed for a cadaveric liver transplant in the US from February 27, 2002 through November 30, 2007 excluding patients younger than 18 years of age, in acute liver failure or who had previously received a liver transplant.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics regarding those liver transplant recipients and candidates who continue to wait during the time-frame studied. The population'is described in relation to those predisposing, enabling and need variables described by Anderson (1995) to explain or predict access to liver transplantation. Multivariate Cox Regression Models were used to investigate the effects of the defined variables on hazard of transplant during the time frame (2002-2007). Two Cox Regression Models were run to evaluate the effect of the MELD 15 Share Rule on hazard of transplantation at higher acuities within the US national system and separately by designated region.
Results: Despite the implementation of an acuity based model of liver allocation, disparities in gender, race and geographical region exist.
Conclusion: There are differences in gender, race and geographical region in the current era of liver allocation in the United States. Despite increased transplantation rates for those of greater acuity, disparities still exist nationally overall and within the 11 UNOS regions. These disparities suggest the need for an evaluation of the US federally mandated system of cadaveric liver allocation.
Sigma Membership
Nu Xi at-Large
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Health Policy, Liver Transplantation, Disparities
Recommended Citation
Brennan, Patricia A., "Access to liver transplantation: Gender, race and geographic disparities...Policy implications" (2013). INRC (Congress). 153.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2013/presentations_2013/153
Conference Name
24th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Prague, Czech Republic
Conference Year
2013
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Access to liver transplantation: Gender, race and geographic disparities...Policy implications
Prague, Czech Republic
Session presented on: Monday, July 22, 2013:
Purpose: To increase the understanding and the effect of specific predisposing, enabling and need variables on access to liver transplantation.
Methods: Kaplan Meir survival and Cox Proportional Hazard regression analyses were conducted using secondary data from the US Scientific Research Transplant Registry (SRTR), managed by the Organ Procurement Transplant Network and the United Network of Organ Sharing that included 32,566 patients. Database United States Scientific Research Transplant Registry (SRTR), with input from the US federally designated Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN).
Population: Individuals wait-listed for a cadaveric liver transplant in the US from February 27, 2002 through November 30, 2007 excluding patients younger than 18 years of age, in acute liver failure or who had previously received a liver transplant.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics regarding those liver transplant recipients and candidates who continue to wait during the time-frame studied. The population'is described in relation to those predisposing, enabling and need variables described by Anderson (1995) to explain or predict access to liver transplantation. Multivariate Cox Regression Models were used to investigate the effects of the defined variables on hazard of transplant during the time frame (2002-2007). Two Cox Regression Models were run to evaluate the effect of the MELD 15 Share Rule on hazard of transplantation at higher acuities within the US national system and separately by designated region.
Results: Despite the implementation of an acuity based model of liver allocation, disparities in gender, race and geographical region exist.
Conclusion: There are differences in gender, race and geographical region in the current era of liver allocation in the United States. Despite increased transplantation rates for those of greater acuity, disparities still exist nationally overall and within the 11 UNOS regions. These disparities suggest the need for an evaluation of the US federally mandated system of cadaveric liver allocation.