Abstract
Session presented on: Wednesday, July 24, 2013:
Purpose: This research developed collaboratively between a regional university in Victoria, Australia and a local rural health service with the goal of improving quality of life for older people living in three residential aged care homes. The aim was to provide health care staff (managers, registered nurses, patient care attendants) with an opportunity to participate in facilitated workshops designed to assist them to develop ways to improve quality of life for residents.
Methods: An action research methodology was adopted as this approach supports group activity founded on a partnership between researcher and participants, all of whom are involved in the change process. The participatory process is educational and empowering, involving a dynamic approach where problem identification, planning, action and evaluation are interlinked. In addition to participating in three workshops, participants consented to be involved in pre and post individual interviews to support the evaluation process.
Results: Thirty health professionals participated in this project. Data indicates participants had an overwhelming desire to deliver a person centred care approach, which included developing stronger relationships with residents. A number of factors were identified in the workshops and interviews as barriers. These barriers included perceived time constraints, task orientated care delivery, staff attitudes towards a relationship centred approach and the institutionalised culture of the facilities. However, this lead to a wide range of actions to improve quality of life for residents, including challenging task orientated ways of practice.
Conclusion: We identified ways to change traditional ways of care through involving those responsible for providing care in the process. This method can be used to make a difference in a range of health settings due to its participatory, educational and innovative approach.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Action Research, Aged Care, Quality of life
Recommended Citation
Penney, Wendy; Martin, Louise Ann; and Clinnick, Lisa M., "Leading change with action research: Improving quality of life in residential aged care" (2013). INRC (Congress). 196.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2013/presentations_2013/196
Conference Name
24th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Prague, Czech Republic
Conference Year
2013
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Leading change with action research: Improving quality of life in residential aged care
Prague, Czech Republic
Session presented on: Wednesday, July 24, 2013:
Purpose: This research developed collaboratively between a regional university in Victoria, Australia and a local rural health service with the goal of improving quality of life for older people living in three residential aged care homes. The aim was to provide health care staff (managers, registered nurses, patient care attendants) with an opportunity to participate in facilitated workshops designed to assist them to develop ways to improve quality of life for residents.
Methods: An action research methodology was adopted as this approach supports group activity founded on a partnership between researcher and participants, all of whom are involved in the change process. The participatory process is educational and empowering, involving a dynamic approach where problem identification, planning, action and evaluation are interlinked. In addition to participating in three workshops, participants consented to be involved in pre and post individual interviews to support the evaluation process.
Results: Thirty health professionals participated in this project. Data indicates participants had an overwhelming desire to deliver a person centred care approach, which included developing stronger relationships with residents. A number of factors were identified in the workshops and interviews as barriers. These barriers included perceived time constraints, task orientated care delivery, staff attitudes towards a relationship centred approach and the institutionalised culture of the facilities. However, this lead to a wide range of actions to improve quality of life for residents, including challenging task orientated ways of practice.
Conclusion: We identified ways to change traditional ways of care through involving those responsible for providing care in the process. This method can be used to make a difference in a range of health settings due to its participatory, educational and innovative approach.