Abstract

Session presented on Saturday, July 26, 2014:

Purpose: Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers remain an utmost healthcare concern because of the significant emotional and physical toll on the patient and the large financial impact on hospitals. With an incidence rate of 38% and a total annual cost of approximately $11 billion dollars in the United States, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service will not reimburse for these injuries. Neurological patients are even more susceptible to pressure ulcer formation than most patients. Consequently, neuro- nurses are charged with being implementation experts of preventative nursing interventions in response to their risk assessments. Yet research shows that there is a gap between risk assessment and application of nursing interventions. Nurses tend to either not apply preventative measures or are inconsistent despite having an 'at risk' patient. Research is needed to address this problem. The proposed study attempts to assist in bridging that gap by assessing the neuro-nurse's understanding of 'at risk' and evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on improving the neuro-nurse's knowledge of pressure ulcer risk assessment and subsequent preventative nursing interventions.

Methods: A descriptive, quasi-experimental design with a one-group, pre-intervention survey, educational intervention, and post-intervention survey method will be used.

Results:A paired t-test was conducted to evaluate the impact of the educational intervention on both Braden score choices and number of nursing interventions chosen by the nurse participants. There was no statistically significant difference in Braden scores post-education (M = 13.41, SD =5.38) vs. pre-education (M = 13.67, SD = 4.49), t (23) =, p

Conclusion: Neuro-nurses are competent on assessing "risk" of pressure ulcers for nuero patients using the Braden Scale. However, there is variation on how to manage risk based on the Braden score assessed. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between risk assessment and nursing application of interventions. This gap may be a contributing factor to the incidence of pressure ulcers in the clinical setting.

Notes

The full-text file for “Download” (upper right) is the poster for this item record. Scroll down to view the supplemental file(s).

Author Details

Shakira Henderson, MS, MPH, RNC-NIC, IBCLC

Sigma Membership

Unknown

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Educational Intervention, Research, Pressure Ulcer

Conference Name

25th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Hong Kong

Conference Year

2014

Abstract.pdf (327 kB)

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Beyond the Braden Scale: Effectiveness of a small group educational program on neuro-nurses' Braden Risk assessment scores and number of preventative nursing interventions

Hong Kong

Session presented on Saturday, July 26, 2014:

Purpose: Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers remain an utmost healthcare concern because of the significant emotional and physical toll on the patient and the large financial impact on hospitals. With an incidence rate of 38% and a total annual cost of approximately $11 billion dollars in the United States, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service will not reimburse for these injuries. Neurological patients are even more susceptible to pressure ulcer formation than most patients. Consequently, neuro- nurses are charged with being implementation experts of preventative nursing interventions in response to their risk assessments. Yet research shows that there is a gap between risk assessment and application of nursing interventions. Nurses tend to either not apply preventative measures or are inconsistent despite having an 'at risk' patient. Research is needed to address this problem. The proposed study attempts to assist in bridging that gap by assessing the neuro-nurse's understanding of 'at risk' and evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on improving the neuro-nurse's knowledge of pressure ulcer risk assessment and subsequent preventative nursing interventions.

Methods: A descriptive, quasi-experimental design with a one-group, pre-intervention survey, educational intervention, and post-intervention survey method will be used.

Results:A paired t-test was conducted to evaluate the impact of the educational intervention on both Braden score choices and number of nursing interventions chosen by the nurse participants. There was no statistically significant difference in Braden scores post-education (M = 13.41, SD =5.38) vs. pre-education (M = 13.67, SD = 4.49), t (23) =, p

Conclusion: Neuro-nurses are competent on assessing "risk" of pressure ulcers for nuero patients using the Braden Scale. However, there is variation on how to manage risk based on the Braden score assessed. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between risk assessment and nursing application of interventions. This gap may be a contributing factor to the incidence of pressure ulcers in the clinical setting.