Other Titles

Nurses' perceptions from student through clinician

Abstract

Session presented on Monday, July 28, 2014:

Purpose: The use of restraints is a controversial issue that may present nurses with legal, ethical and practical dilemmas. Restraint use can result in numerous problems for the patients, including death by strangulation, falls injuries, deconditioning, skin breakdown, incontinence, constipation and psychological effects such as agitationand emotional distress. The aim of this study was to investigate nurses' attitudes towards restraint use and related factors.

Methods: A descriptive study was conducted to measure nurses' attitudes toward restraint use. Nurses employed in areas of internal, surgical, and sanatorium wards of three hospitals received the questionnaire. Japanese Version of Perceptions of Restraint Use Questionnaire (PRUQ), which is 17 item questionnaire measures nurses' attitudes toward restraint use, was used. Each item is ranked on a 5-point Likerttype scale. A higher score indicates that the item is considered to be an important justification for the use of physical restraints. The instrument was judged to have face and content validity by a panel of gerontology nurse experts.

Results: The questionnaire was sent to a total of 227 nurses and was returned by 205, giving a response rate of 90.3%. The sample had a mean age of 35.8 years (range 20-62 years, SD 10.1) and had been nursing for an average of 7.6 years (range 0.4-34years, SD 7.4). As expected, the majority of respondents were women (94.6%). Nearly half of the respondents (45.1%) worked in internal wards, and surgical wards (24.4%) or sanatorium wards (25.4%). The mean score on the PRUQ was 2.897 (possible range 1-5), indicating that respondents in this sample had a slightly negative attitude toward the use of restraints. Positive attitudes were shown about items such as preventing a patient from breaking open sutures and pulling out a catheter, feeding tube, and IV. Twelve of 17 items were significantly different due to type of ward, especially surgical wards indicated positive attitudes.

Conclusion: Nurses' attitudes toward restraint use showed positive about preventing from pulling out catheter, feeding tube, and IV, moreover, different attitudes were observed among three wards.

Authors

Miho Matsui

Author Details

Miho Matsui, RN, PhD

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Descriptive/Correlational

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Japan, Restraints, Nurses' Perceptions

Conference Name

25th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Hong Kong

Conference Year

2014

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Nurses' attitudes toward restraint use in Japanese hospitals

Hong Kong

Session presented on Monday, July 28, 2014:

Purpose: The use of restraints is a controversial issue that may present nurses with legal, ethical and practical dilemmas. Restraint use can result in numerous problems for the patients, including death by strangulation, falls injuries, deconditioning, skin breakdown, incontinence, constipation and psychological effects such as agitationand emotional distress. The aim of this study was to investigate nurses' attitudes towards restraint use and related factors.

Methods: A descriptive study was conducted to measure nurses' attitudes toward restraint use. Nurses employed in areas of internal, surgical, and sanatorium wards of three hospitals received the questionnaire. Japanese Version of Perceptions of Restraint Use Questionnaire (PRUQ), which is 17 item questionnaire measures nurses' attitudes toward restraint use, was used. Each item is ranked on a 5-point Likerttype scale. A higher score indicates that the item is considered to be an important justification for the use of physical restraints. The instrument was judged to have face and content validity by a panel of gerontology nurse experts.

Results: The questionnaire was sent to a total of 227 nurses and was returned by 205, giving a response rate of 90.3%. The sample had a mean age of 35.8 years (range 20-62 years, SD 10.1) and had been nursing for an average of 7.6 years (range 0.4-34years, SD 7.4). As expected, the majority of respondents were women (94.6%). Nearly half of the respondents (45.1%) worked in internal wards, and surgical wards (24.4%) or sanatorium wards (25.4%). The mean score on the PRUQ was 2.897 (possible range 1-5), indicating that respondents in this sample had a slightly negative attitude toward the use of restraints. Positive attitudes were shown about items such as preventing a patient from breaking open sutures and pulling out a catheter, feeding tube, and IV. Twelve of 17 items were significantly different due to type of ward, especially surgical wards indicated positive attitudes.

Conclusion: Nurses' attitudes toward restraint use showed positive about preventing from pulling out catheter, feeding tube, and IV, moreover, different attitudes were observed among three wards.