Other Titles
Clinically relevant global nursing education
Abstract
Session presented on Sunday, July 27, 2014:
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to determine what evidence exists to support or refute the hypothesis that continuing education ensures continuing competence to practise and assures public safety. The research builds on a previous international study that focused on the development of an international consensus view for the assessment of continuing competence.
Methods: The research has been undertaken using a three stage mixed method evaluation design. Each stage of the research has been completed sequentially. Stage One focuses on a critical analysis of current Case law related to nurse competence notifications. Stage Two, an analysis of data competence notification data received and processed by regulatory authorities, and Stage Three, interviews with key staff employed by regulatory authorities to process these cases. Triangulation of data has occured to derive the overarching outcomes from this study.
Results: A common indicator of continuing competence, required by regulatory authorities is continuing education or continuing professional development. However, does continuing education ensure continuing competence and assure public safety? Whilst continuing competence is agreed by regulatory authorities to be necessary to protect the public in health professional regulation. Definitions of continuing competence within legislation and policy across developed nations have strong similarities, international research indicates that there is confusion over the level to which continuing competence needs to be demonstrated, the criteria against which continuing competence should be assessed and the role of continuing competence frameworks in ensuring public safety. In this presentation the preliminary research findings and opinion will be presented and discussed.
Conclusion: This research has sought to understand and dtermine the relationships between continuing education, continuing competence requirements for nurses in New Zealand and Australia, and the relevant legislation with regard to assuring public safety, and as a result the implication for nurses in terms of their continued safety to practice.
Sigma Membership
Non-member
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Continuing Education, Continuing Competence, Public Safety
Recommended Citation
Vernon, Rachael A. and Chiarella, Mary, "Continuing education ensures competence to practice and assures public safety" (2014). INRC (Congress). 258.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2014/presentations_2014/258
Conference Name
25th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Hong Kong
Conference Year
2014
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Continuing education ensures competence to practice and assures public safety
Hong Kong
Session presented on Sunday, July 27, 2014:
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to determine what evidence exists to support or refute the hypothesis that continuing education ensures continuing competence to practise and assures public safety. The research builds on a previous international study that focused on the development of an international consensus view for the assessment of continuing competence.
Methods: The research has been undertaken using a three stage mixed method evaluation design. Each stage of the research has been completed sequentially. Stage One focuses on a critical analysis of current Case law related to nurse competence notifications. Stage Two, an analysis of data competence notification data received and processed by regulatory authorities, and Stage Three, interviews with key staff employed by regulatory authorities to process these cases. Triangulation of data has occured to derive the overarching outcomes from this study.
Results: A common indicator of continuing competence, required by regulatory authorities is continuing education or continuing professional development. However, does continuing education ensure continuing competence and assure public safety? Whilst continuing competence is agreed by regulatory authorities to be necessary to protect the public in health professional regulation. Definitions of continuing competence within legislation and policy across developed nations have strong similarities, international research indicates that there is confusion over the level to which continuing competence needs to be demonstrated, the criteria against which continuing competence should be assessed and the role of continuing competence frameworks in ensuring public safety. In this presentation the preliminary research findings and opinion will be presented and discussed.
Conclusion: This research has sought to understand and dtermine the relationships between continuing education, continuing competence requirements for nurses in New Zealand and Australia, and the relevant legislation with regard to assuring public safety, and as a result the implication for nurses in terms of their continued safety to practice.