Abstract

Purpose: Hospital acquired infection (HAI) is a critical patient safety concern. These infections are a reflection of hospital care provided to patients. The prevalence of HAI is widespread with catheter acquired urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) accounting for approximately 40% of HAIs with the highest rates in intensive care units. At the University of Kentucky we identified that our rates were higher than expected. It was determined that a support structure was needed to help direct and identify all the activities that would be necessary to decrease the CAUTI rate. The purpose of the performance improvement project was to create an organizational structure to centralize all enterprise wide initiatives to decrease CAUTIs. Methods: An alliance was formed with senior leadership, clinical nurse specialists and our colleagues in Infection Prevention and Control. This alliance led to a workflow algorithm that outlined an organizational structure consisting of a CAUTI workgroup that reported up to a CAUTI Steering Committee, led by senior leadership. The work group met weekly and followed a systematic process that identified gaps in care, designed interventions and implemented the measures. The Steering Committee met monthly to review and examine the progress of the workgroup. The Steering Committee provided the leadership and oversight to support the interventions and the authority to move forward with the implementations. This organization structure was instrumental to guide and direct improvement measures. Results: With the organizational support structure and the standardized workflow of the workgroup, our enterprise-wide monthly ICU CAUTI rates having been trending downward. In the first quarter of FY 2014 our rates ranged from 5.9 to 9.0. In October 2014 our rate decreased to 2.4. Conclusion: Having a well-defined organizational structure to centralize identification and interventions provided the support needed to decrease our high infection rate. This model has shown very positive outcomes and has provided a clear line of communication between hospital administration, physician services, nursing leadership, clinical nurse specialist, staff development, staff nursing and Infection Prevention and Control. The model has been duplicated to direct our work with combating other nurse sensitive indicators; central line infections, pressure ulcers and venous thromboembolism.

Author Details

Sarah E. Gabbard, RN

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Structure, Process, Centralized

Conference Name

26th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Conference Year

2015

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

UK healthcare enterprise wide initiative: Decreasing hospital acquired urinary tract infections

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Purpose: Hospital acquired infection (HAI) is a critical patient safety concern. These infections are a reflection of hospital care provided to patients. The prevalence of HAI is widespread with catheter acquired urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) accounting for approximately 40% of HAIs with the highest rates in intensive care units. At the University of Kentucky we identified that our rates were higher than expected. It was determined that a support structure was needed to help direct and identify all the activities that would be necessary to decrease the CAUTI rate. The purpose of the performance improvement project was to create an organizational structure to centralize all enterprise wide initiatives to decrease CAUTIs. Methods: An alliance was formed with senior leadership, clinical nurse specialists and our colleagues in Infection Prevention and Control. This alliance led to a workflow algorithm that outlined an organizational structure consisting of a CAUTI workgroup that reported up to a CAUTI Steering Committee, led by senior leadership. The work group met weekly and followed a systematic process that identified gaps in care, designed interventions and implemented the measures. The Steering Committee met monthly to review and examine the progress of the workgroup. The Steering Committee provided the leadership and oversight to support the interventions and the authority to move forward with the implementations. This organization structure was instrumental to guide and direct improvement measures. Results: With the organizational support structure and the standardized workflow of the workgroup, our enterprise-wide monthly ICU CAUTI rates having been trending downward. In the first quarter of FY 2014 our rates ranged from 5.9 to 9.0. In October 2014 our rate decreased to 2.4. Conclusion: Having a well-defined organizational structure to centralize identification and interventions provided the support needed to decrease our high infection rate. This model has shown very positive outcomes and has provided a clear line of communication between hospital administration, physician services, nursing leadership, clinical nurse specialist, staff development, staff nursing and Infection Prevention and Control. The model has been duplicated to direct our work with combating other nurse sensitive indicators; central line infections, pressure ulcers and venous thromboembolism.