Other Titles

Quality care of the elderly

Abstract

Purpose: The overall objective is to explore the experiences of graduates from the National School of Nursing and Obstetrics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) in relation to the factors that influence the process of clinical decision making during their social service.

Methods: Phenomenological qualitative study was executed using a focus group of seven recent nursing school graduates. This study is semi-structured based on the process and sources of clinical decision making proposed by Dr. Andrea Marshall. From the focus group, audiovisual data was recorded transcribed and micro analyzed through open and axial coding in order to find categories and subcategories of factors involving their decision making.

Results: Two main categories emerged: The first one reveals on what the graduates base their clinical decisions. Graduates based their decisions more on information from outdated healthcare personnel and textbooks than proper consultation of scientific evidence and resources. They also fall back on unfounded practical knowledge without applying sound theory. The second category is in regards to the factors that influence the graduates process of clinical decision making. Nursing school graduate students tend to study in a linear and stagnant manner. They limit their development to simply following instructions and memorizing facts instead of developing skills such as citical thinking, nonlinear analysis , and professional management in addition to written and spoken English comprehension. These factors, along with the dissociation of theory and practice, have been found to influence and create problems in the graduates decision making process especially in scenarios such as when having to treat a patient without a supervising figure as a facilitator.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that to make clinical decisions, graduates are based more on unfounded practical knowledge and informal opinions of others such as colleagues and/or senior staff rather than rely on up to date sicientific evidence and critical thinking. This severely impacts their ability to make the kinds of competent decisions that nursing demands.

Author Details

Laura Moran, RN; Maribel Aguilera Rivera, BSN

Sigma Membership

Non-member

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

Phenomenology

Research Approach

Qualitative Research

Keywords:

Clinical Decision Making, Nursing Graduate, Accurate Sources of Information

Conference Name

27th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Cape Town, South Africa

Conference Year

2016

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Share

COinS
 

Experiences in clinical decision making for nursing school graduates

Cape Town, South Africa

Purpose: The overall objective is to explore the experiences of graduates from the National School of Nursing and Obstetrics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) in relation to the factors that influence the process of clinical decision making during their social service.

Methods: Phenomenological qualitative study was executed using a focus group of seven recent nursing school graduates. This study is semi-structured based on the process and sources of clinical decision making proposed by Dr. Andrea Marshall. From the focus group, audiovisual data was recorded transcribed and micro analyzed through open and axial coding in order to find categories and subcategories of factors involving their decision making.

Results: Two main categories emerged: The first one reveals on what the graduates base their clinical decisions. Graduates based their decisions more on information from outdated healthcare personnel and textbooks than proper consultation of scientific evidence and resources. They also fall back on unfounded practical knowledge without applying sound theory. The second category is in regards to the factors that influence the graduates process of clinical decision making. Nursing school graduate students tend to study in a linear and stagnant manner. They limit their development to simply following instructions and memorizing facts instead of developing skills such as citical thinking, nonlinear analysis , and professional management in addition to written and spoken English comprehension. These factors, along with the dissociation of theory and practice, have been found to influence and create problems in the graduates decision making process especially in scenarios such as when having to treat a patient without a supervising figure as a facilitator.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that to make clinical decisions, graduates are based more on unfounded practical knowledge and informal opinions of others such as colleagues and/or senior staff rather than rely on up to date sicientific evidence and critical thinking. This severely impacts their ability to make the kinds of competent decisions that nursing demands.