Abstract

Purpose: The WHO reports that the incidence of TB is approximately 9.0 million new cases globally each year and approximately 3.3 million cases are missed by health systems as either undiagnosed or not reported. A single index case can infect up to 10 to 15 contacts over the course of a year. Thus, complete and timely evaluation of all contacts exposed to TB is crucial for decreasing the transmission and incidence of TB. Several barriers to testing of contacts have been identified, however, no studies specifically address contacts" non-acceptance to TB testing and evaluation. Both nurses and non-nurse managers conduct contact investigations (CI), but it is not known if there are differences in adherence to TB testing and evaluation based on type of provider. The study will seek to determine factors associated with non-acceptance of TB testing and evaluations as well as compare testing adherence rates among household contacts manage by nurses versus non-nurse managers.

Pender"s Health Promotion Model (HPM) will guide the examination of factors that prevent contacts from accepting TB testing and evaluation. The HMP stresses that an understanding of the major determinants of health informs the counseling of healthy behaviors. Uncovering the factors that determine a contact"s behavior will likely lead to effective counseling of contacts exposed to TB.

Methods: A retrospective study of four years of data extracted from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene TB registry will be used to assess factors associated with household contact"s non-acceptance of TB testing and evaluation. Data elements include demographics, contact information, reporting and assignment, clinical disposition, and case management provider type. Logistic regression will be used to assess the probability of not accepting TB testing and evaluation based on independent variables, and to assess differences between two independent variables: a nurse manager and a non-nurse manager with non-acceptance of TB testing and evaluation.

Results: On-going research.

Conclusion: Study findings will provide data to facilitate health departments to develop appropriate strategies to increase household contacts" acceptance of TB testing and evaluation.

Authors

Elvy G. Barroso

Author Details

Elvy G. Barroso, MD, MSc, MS, MPH, RN, RN

Sigma Membership

Alpha Phi

Lead Author Affiliation

The City University of New York, New York, New York, USA

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Nursing Case Management, Tuberculosis

Conference Name

28th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Dublin, Ireland

Conference Year

2017

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Additional Files

download (246 kB)

download (146 kB)

Share

COinS
 

Factors associated with non-acceptance of testing and evaluation of household contacts exposed to tuberculosis

Dublin, Ireland

Purpose: The WHO reports that the incidence of TB is approximately 9.0 million new cases globally each year and approximately 3.3 million cases are missed by health systems as either undiagnosed or not reported. A single index case can infect up to 10 to 15 contacts over the course of a year. Thus, complete and timely evaluation of all contacts exposed to TB is crucial for decreasing the transmission and incidence of TB. Several barriers to testing of contacts have been identified, however, no studies specifically address contacts" non-acceptance to TB testing and evaluation. Both nurses and non-nurse managers conduct contact investigations (CI), but it is not known if there are differences in adherence to TB testing and evaluation based on type of provider. The study will seek to determine factors associated with non-acceptance of TB testing and evaluations as well as compare testing adherence rates among household contacts manage by nurses versus non-nurse managers.

Pender"s Health Promotion Model (HPM) will guide the examination of factors that prevent contacts from accepting TB testing and evaluation. The HMP stresses that an understanding of the major determinants of health informs the counseling of healthy behaviors. Uncovering the factors that determine a contact"s behavior will likely lead to effective counseling of contacts exposed to TB.

Methods: A retrospective study of four years of data extracted from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene TB registry will be used to assess factors associated with household contact"s non-acceptance of TB testing and evaluation. Data elements include demographics, contact information, reporting and assignment, clinical disposition, and case management provider type. Logistic regression will be used to assess the probability of not accepting TB testing and evaluation based on independent variables, and to assess differences between two independent variables: a nurse manager and a non-nurse manager with non-acceptance of TB testing and evaluation.

Results: On-going research.

Conclusion: Study findings will provide data to facilitate health departments to develop appropriate strategies to increase household contacts" acceptance of TB testing and evaluation.