Abstract
Background: The transfer and handover of critically ill pediatric patients from the pediatric emergency department (PED) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a period of vulnerability associated with adverse events. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has emphasized that multiple threats to patient safety exist during the transfer of patients due to the potential for delayed, incorrect, interrupted, or incomplete communications. Furthermore, delays in transfer and handover impact the time for the patient to receive definitive treatment.
Aims: Using a Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework, the aims of this project were to 1) examine staff members" satisfaction with the current handover and transport process, 2) develop a new protocol and process for handover, and 3) evaluate staff satisfaction with the standardized, interdisciplinary, handover and transport process.
Methods: Focus groups were conducted to determine barriers and facilitators to the current handover and transport process. Using these data, a multi-disciplinary team convened to establish seven patient criteria for specialized transport as well as a standardized, interdisciplinary handover tool. The seven patient criteria were; 1.) Out of hospital witnessed arrest with return of spontaneous circulation, 2.) Status epilepticus, 3.) Complex cardiac patients with unstable vital signs, 4.) Intubation or ventilation requirements in the form of new BiPAP or CPaP, 5.) Shock physiology with vasopressor requirement, 6.) New Glasgow Coma Scale less than 10, 7.) High risk for acute compensation at the discretion of the attending physician. When patients met the established criteria, the PICU nurse and physician would come directly to the ED for team-to-team (the Pediatric Expedited Team) handover and physically assist with the transport to the PICU. The new process was piloted over a 6-month period, from September 2015 to March 2016. Staff satisfaction regarding the new process was examined pre and post-intervention using mixed methods.
Findings: Focus groups revealed five themes: need for improved communication, cultural dissonance among units, defects in system and processes, need for standardization, and ambiguity between providers regarding acuity. During the 6- month pilot period there were 370 PED to PICU transfers, 45 of which activated the PET Team (12.1%). Quantitative data were analyzed using cross-tabulations and descriptive statistics. Staff members reported improvements in their perceptions of satisfaction, safety, communication, and role understanding with the new process.
Sigma Membership
Nu Beta at-Large
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Handover and Transfer Process, Pediatric Expedited Transfer Team, Standardized Handover Tool
Recommended Citation
Foronda, Cynthia L.; VanGraafeiland, Brigit; Vanderwagen, Sarah; Allan, Laura; Bernier, Meghan; Fishe, Jennifer; Hunt, Elizabeth; and Jeffers, Justin, "A standardized handover and transport process for critically ill pediatric patients: An interdisciplinary collaboration" (2017). INRC (Congress). 98.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2017/posters_2017/98
Conference Name
28th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Dublin, Ireland
Conference Year
2017
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
A standardized handover and transport process for critically ill pediatric patients: An interdisciplinary collaboration
Dublin, Ireland
Background: The transfer and handover of critically ill pediatric patients from the pediatric emergency department (PED) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a period of vulnerability associated with adverse events. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has emphasized that multiple threats to patient safety exist during the transfer of patients due to the potential for delayed, incorrect, interrupted, or incomplete communications. Furthermore, delays in transfer and handover impact the time for the patient to receive definitive treatment.
Aims: Using a Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework, the aims of this project were to 1) examine staff members" satisfaction with the current handover and transport process, 2) develop a new protocol and process for handover, and 3) evaluate staff satisfaction with the standardized, interdisciplinary, handover and transport process.
Methods: Focus groups were conducted to determine barriers and facilitators to the current handover and transport process. Using these data, a multi-disciplinary team convened to establish seven patient criteria for specialized transport as well as a standardized, interdisciplinary handover tool. The seven patient criteria were; 1.) Out of hospital witnessed arrest with return of spontaneous circulation, 2.) Status epilepticus, 3.) Complex cardiac patients with unstable vital signs, 4.) Intubation or ventilation requirements in the form of new BiPAP or CPaP, 5.) Shock physiology with vasopressor requirement, 6.) New Glasgow Coma Scale less than 10, 7.) High risk for acute compensation at the discretion of the attending physician. When patients met the established criteria, the PICU nurse and physician would come directly to the ED for team-to-team (the Pediatric Expedited Team) handover and physically assist with the transport to the PICU. The new process was piloted over a 6-month period, from September 2015 to March 2016. Staff satisfaction regarding the new process was examined pre and post-intervention using mixed methods.
Findings: Focus groups revealed five themes: need for improved communication, cultural dissonance among units, defects in system and processes, need for standardization, and ambiguity between providers regarding acuity. During the 6- month pilot period there were 370 PED to PICU transfers, 45 of which activated the PET Team (12.1%). Quantitative data were analyzed using cross-tabulations and descriptive statistics. Staff members reported improvements in their perceptions of satisfaction, safety, communication, and role understanding with the new process.