Reducing antibiotic use in the management of upper respiratory infections in the urgent care setting
Other Titles
Use of antibiotics
Abstract
Purpose: Upper Respiratory Infections (URIs) are the most common presenting complaint to urgent care centers across the United States. Regardless of etiology or provider specialty, antibiotics are prescribed 60% of the time for the treatment of URIs, contributing to drug resistant respiratory organisms which often provide clinical management challenges for patients and their providers. These practices impact patient outcomes, quality of care, antimicrobial resistance, and economics in community and hospital settings. Chart reviews at a local urgent care company revealed similar practices among providers. Differences in provider type, knowledge base, confidence, practice experiences, and the lack of company adopted treatment guidelines were noted to be probable contributors. As a result, a quality improvement project was implemented to promote quality, evidenced based care in the management of patients with upper respiratory infections.
Methods: A multimodal intervention combining provider consensus meetings, clinical guideline review and development, use of clinical pathways, prescriber feedback and audit, and patient education was implemented at two urgent care centers to reduce the rate of antibiotic prescribing for URIs. Antibiotic prescribing rates for the baseline and intervention periods were obtained through the review of 273 patient charts with diagnoses of URI, nasopharyngitis, bronchitis, and sinusitis for each respective period and compared. Clinical guideline adherence rates were also captured and analyzed for this intervention.
Results: Evaluation of 273 patient encounters with diagnoses of URI, sinusitis and bronchitis during the intervention period demonstrated a 56.8% reduction in the prescribing rate of antibiotics (CI 95%, p <0.00) and an 87.2% rate of compliance with the adopted clinical guidelines (CI 95%, p < 0.00).
Conclusion: Antibiotic prescribing for common URI diagnoses was significantly reduced at two urgent care centers through the implementation of multimodal strategies targeting providers and patients. Such an approach could enhance compliance with URI evidence-based practice guidelines in the outpatient setting resulting in the judicious use of antibiotics.
Sigma Membership
Unknown
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Antibiotic Use, Upper Respiratory Infections, Urgent Care
Recommended Citation
Holley, Melissa Jones, "Reducing antibiotic use in the management of upper respiratory infections in the urgent care setting" (2017). INRC (Congress). 7.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2017/presentations_2017/7
Conference Name
28th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Dublin, Ireland
Conference Year
2017
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Reducing antibiotic use in the management of upper respiratory infections in the urgent care setting
Dublin, Ireland
Purpose: Upper Respiratory Infections (URIs) are the most common presenting complaint to urgent care centers across the United States. Regardless of etiology or provider specialty, antibiotics are prescribed 60% of the time for the treatment of URIs, contributing to drug resistant respiratory organisms which often provide clinical management challenges for patients and their providers. These practices impact patient outcomes, quality of care, antimicrobial resistance, and economics in community and hospital settings. Chart reviews at a local urgent care company revealed similar practices among providers. Differences in provider type, knowledge base, confidence, practice experiences, and the lack of company adopted treatment guidelines were noted to be probable contributors. As a result, a quality improvement project was implemented to promote quality, evidenced based care in the management of patients with upper respiratory infections.
Methods: A multimodal intervention combining provider consensus meetings, clinical guideline review and development, use of clinical pathways, prescriber feedback and audit, and patient education was implemented at two urgent care centers to reduce the rate of antibiotic prescribing for URIs. Antibiotic prescribing rates for the baseline and intervention periods were obtained through the review of 273 patient charts with diagnoses of URI, nasopharyngitis, bronchitis, and sinusitis for each respective period and compared. Clinical guideline adherence rates were also captured and analyzed for this intervention.
Results: Evaluation of 273 patient encounters with diagnoses of URI, sinusitis and bronchitis during the intervention period demonstrated a 56.8% reduction in the prescribing rate of antibiotics (CI 95%, p <0.00) and an 87.2% rate of compliance with the adopted clinical guidelines (CI 95%, p < 0.00).
Conclusion: Antibiotic prescribing for common URI diagnoses was significantly reduced at two urgent care centers through the implementation of multimodal strategies targeting providers and patients. Such an approach could enhance compliance with URI evidence-based practice guidelines in the outpatient setting resulting in the judicious use of antibiotics.