Abstract

This study used systemic review and meta-analysis approach to compare outcomes and cost-effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR).

Author Details

Chia-Feng Hung, MSN, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan; Yong-Yuan Chang, MPH, ScD, Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Sigma Membership

Unknown

Lead Author Affiliation

Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan

Type

Poster

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Aortic Stenosis, Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Conference Name

29th International Nursing Research Congress

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Melbourne, Australia

Conference Year

2018

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Additional Files

download (294 kB)

Share

COinS
 

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis

Melbourne, Australia

This study used systemic review and meta-analysis approach to compare outcomes and cost-effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR).