Abstract
We will share key lessons from a major University's Evaluation of research culture and performance. "School of Nursing & Health" leaders and external reviewer will reveal and discuss salient learnings for researchers and schools. We will stimulate challenging conversations regarding the need for external scrutiny and how schools should respond.
Sigma Membership
Phi Eta
Lead Author Affiliation
Philip Darbyshire Consulting Ltd, Highbury, South Australia, Australia
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Study Design/Type
N/A
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
External Research Review, Research Culture, Research Scrutiny
Recommended Citation
Darbyshire, Philip; Mullersdorf, Maria; and Gustafsson, Christine, "Boosting research performance: Lessons learned from external scrutiny of faculty research, culture, strategies, and approaches" (2018). INRC (Congress). 70.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/inrc/2018/posters_2018/70
Conference Name
29th International Nursing Research Congress
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International
Conference Location
Melbourne, Australia
Conference Year
2018
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Boosting research performance: Lessons learned from external scrutiny of faculty research, culture, strategies, and approaches
Melbourne, Australia
We will share key lessons from a major University's Evaluation of research culture and performance. "School of Nursing & Health" leaders and external reviewer will reveal and discuss salient learnings for researchers and schools. We will stimulate challenging conversations regarding the need for external scrutiny and how schools should respond.