Other Titles

Nursing academia: Retaining faculty through recruitment and peer monitoring

Abstract

Session presented on Monday, September 19, 2016:

Pursuit of tenure is an arduous task. Expectations for tenure include achieving excellence in teaching, service, and scholarship. While different schools have varying requirements for tenure, one of the most difficult to achieve is scholarship. Scholarship at small, undergraduate schools of nursing is often a daunting task. At such institutions, teaching is often the primary focus and expectation, making completion of scholarship that much more difficult because of lack of time and resources. Many faculty, although PhD-prepared, find the transition to faculty responsibilities overwhelming and often take 5-15 years to develop a program of scholarship and master teaching (Heinrich & Oberleitner, 2012). Additionally, more tenure track faculty are being hired with master's degrees or doctorates of nursing practice, and in their education, research was not a foundation so they are unprepared for the rigors of scholarship to achieve tenure (Oermann, Lynn, & Agger, 2015). Therefore, academic environments, particularly at small universities are becoming increasingly complex, producing barriers for faculty to achieve success in scholarship. Although many institutions have modified versions of what is expected for tenure, scholarship at some level remains a valued obligation. In smaller academic settings, each faculty member may have diverse areas of research, leading to a lack of collaborative possibilities and contributing to feelings of isolation. Faculty are busy, especially in schools of nursing, with clinical courses at a variety of sites. There is little time to spend with other faculty members brainstorming and developing well-rounded relationships, particularly ones that enhance other's scholarship obligations and promote collaboration on scholarship with one another. Peer mentoring and blending various faculty members' strengths can help faculty members realize success by setting realistic goals, promoting accountability, perhaps improving faculty recruitment and retention (Heinrich & Oberleitner, 2012), and reducing incidences of incivility (Bostian Peters, 2014). The purpose of this presentation is to describe a 2 year, monthly, 1-hour faculty gathering (Think Tank) in which faculty share their scholarly pursuits, resources, research strengths, and experiences. Results of the Think Tank project indicate successful outcomes in producing scholarly accomplishments. Compared to scholarly achievements before Think Tank, collaborative projects among faculty increased. Publications and peer-reviewed national and international presentations saw significant growth. Faculty applications for internal and external funding also expanded. Successful strategies to engage faculty are described and successful outcomes are highlighted.

Author Details

Wendy C. Kooken, RN; Amanda F. Hopkins, RN

Sigma Membership

Alpha Lambda

Lead Author Affiliation

Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, Illinois, USA

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Study Design/Type

N/A

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Collaborative Academic Culture, Faculty Scholarship, Peer Mentoring

Conference Name

Leadership Connection 2016

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International

Conference Location

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Conference Year

2016

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Additional Files

download (588 kB)

Share

COinS
 

Creating a collaborative academic culture for successful scholarship in nursing faculty

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Session presented on Monday, September 19, 2016:

Pursuit of tenure is an arduous task. Expectations for tenure include achieving excellence in teaching, service, and scholarship. While different schools have varying requirements for tenure, one of the most difficult to achieve is scholarship. Scholarship at small, undergraduate schools of nursing is often a daunting task. At such institutions, teaching is often the primary focus and expectation, making completion of scholarship that much more difficult because of lack of time and resources. Many faculty, although PhD-prepared, find the transition to faculty responsibilities overwhelming and often take 5-15 years to develop a program of scholarship and master teaching (Heinrich & Oberleitner, 2012). Additionally, more tenure track faculty are being hired with master's degrees or doctorates of nursing practice, and in their education, research was not a foundation so they are unprepared for the rigors of scholarship to achieve tenure (Oermann, Lynn, & Agger, 2015). Therefore, academic environments, particularly at small universities are becoming increasingly complex, producing barriers for faculty to achieve success in scholarship. Although many institutions have modified versions of what is expected for tenure, scholarship at some level remains a valued obligation. In smaller academic settings, each faculty member may have diverse areas of research, leading to a lack of collaborative possibilities and contributing to feelings of isolation. Faculty are busy, especially in schools of nursing, with clinical courses at a variety of sites. There is little time to spend with other faculty members brainstorming and developing well-rounded relationships, particularly ones that enhance other's scholarship obligations and promote collaboration on scholarship with one another. Peer mentoring and blending various faculty members' strengths can help faculty members realize success by setting realistic goals, promoting accountability, perhaps improving faculty recruitment and retention (Heinrich & Oberleitner, 2012), and reducing incidences of incivility (Bostian Peters, 2014). The purpose of this presentation is to describe a 2 year, monthly, 1-hour faculty gathering (Think Tank) in which faculty share their scholarly pursuits, resources, research strengths, and experiences. Results of the Think Tank project indicate successful outcomes in producing scholarly accomplishments. Compared to scholarly achievements before Think Tank, collaborative projects among faculty increased. Publications and peer-reviewed national and international presentations saw significant growth. Faculty applications for internal and external funding also expanded. Successful strategies to engage faculty are described and successful outcomes are highlighted.