Other Titles
DEU
Abstract
Session presented on: Friday, April 4, 2014:
As health care increases in complexity, clinical learning continues remains a critical issue in nursing education. This session compares the findings from two similar studies undertaken at two Midwestern public universities with comparable curricula, each with a different precepted clinical model. Both studies considered student perceptions of learning facilitation, practice opportunities with skills, and learning outcomes in the related didactic coursework among students in the precepted and traditional model groups. The first study considered a precepted clinical learning model in which students were placed in a single health care system and worked with preceptors from that agency with a consistent faculty member for multiple semesters. In this study students in the precepted model reported more 'hands on' practice across many of the skills, and in the first semester of the program, perceived more support and satisfaction with the clinical experience than those in traditional clinical groups. In the second study, students in dedicated education units (DEU) were compared with students in a hybrid/combination model and a traditional clinical. Like the first study, students in the DEU reported more psychomotor skills opportunities. Student satisfaction was uniformly high across groups. In both studies, student learning outcomes measured by standardized examinations were compared with no significant differences. Both studies additionally sought qualitative student remarks, which provided a rich context for considering student perceptions of their learning environments. As it is critical to create graduates who have developed the knowledge, thinking skills and psychomotor capacity needed to practice effectively, this session will compare and contrast positive and non-significant findings from these two studies, complementing this analysis with qualitative student perceptions. Conclusions will be drawn regarding advantages of precepted clinical models, and the areas where both innovative and traditional clinical models fall short. Next steps in the study of clinical learning environments will be explored.
Sigma Membership
Alpha
Lead Author Affiliation
Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Clinical Education, Research, Precepted
Recommended Citation
Hendricks, Susan M.; DeMeester, Debbie; and Wallace, Linda, "Student perceptions, experiences and outcomes in two studies of precepted and traditional clinical learning environments" (2014). NERC (Nursing Education Research Conference). 11.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/nerc/2014/presentations_2014/11
Conference Name
Nursing Education Research Conference 2014
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International,National League for Nursing
Conference Location
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Conference Year
2014
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Student perceptions, experiences and outcomes in two studies of precepted and traditional clinical learning environments
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Session presented on: Friday, April 4, 2014:
As health care increases in complexity, clinical learning continues remains a critical issue in nursing education. This session compares the findings from two similar studies undertaken at two Midwestern public universities with comparable curricula, each with a different precepted clinical model. Both studies considered student perceptions of learning facilitation, practice opportunities with skills, and learning outcomes in the related didactic coursework among students in the precepted and traditional model groups. The first study considered a precepted clinical learning model in which students were placed in a single health care system and worked with preceptors from that agency with a consistent faculty member for multiple semesters. In this study students in the precepted model reported more 'hands on' practice across many of the skills, and in the first semester of the program, perceived more support and satisfaction with the clinical experience than those in traditional clinical groups. In the second study, students in dedicated education units (DEU) were compared with students in a hybrid/combination model and a traditional clinical. Like the first study, students in the DEU reported more psychomotor skills opportunities. Student satisfaction was uniformly high across groups. In both studies, student learning outcomes measured by standardized examinations were compared with no significant differences. Both studies additionally sought qualitative student remarks, which provided a rich context for considering student perceptions of their learning environments. As it is critical to create graduates who have developed the knowledge, thinking skills and psychomotor capacity needed to practice effectively, this session will compare and contrast positive and non-significant findings from these two studies, complementing this analysis with qualitative student perceptions. Conclusions will be drawn regarding advantages of precepted clinical models, and the areas where both innovative and traditional clinical models fall short. Next steps in the study of clinical learning environments will be explored.