Other Titles

Nursing Informatics

Abstract

Session presented on: Saturday, April 5, 2014: Problem: Decision making requires data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in today's data- and technology-rich environments. Nurses need nursing-informatics (NI) competencies to support their decision making. The TIGER Initiative published NI competencies for all nurses, encompassing basic computer skills, information literacy, and clinical-information management. Reliable, valid measures to assess these competencies are lacking. This research aimed to develop a reliable, valid online instrument for self-assessment of perceived NI competencies based on the TIGER competencies. Methods: Instrument development involved concept definition, establishing the objective, and identification of items. Three competency scales were created: basic computer, information literacy, and clinical-information management. Three external NI experts independently confirmed retention of all items in each scale. Items were rewritten with behavioral verbs. Three external NI experts assessed content validity of each scale. The TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) was piloted with members of an online NI discussion forum. Results: The sample of 168 respondents was predominantly female nurses, 26-70 years of age, with a master's degree in nursing and 2-5 years of NI practice but not certified. Content validity, internal-consistency reliability, and a factor analysis were calculated. Mean scores on a scale of 1 to 4 were: basic-computer competencies (3.975), information-literacy competencies (3.226), and clinical-information-management competencies (3.358). Reliability coefficients for the 3 scales ranged from 0.948 to 0.980. Specific results for each scale and the instrument as a whole will be shared. Conclusions: TIGER competencies establish a foundation for developing a self-assessment of perceived NI competencies. The TIGER competencies required revision to incorporate measurable behaviors. After review and revisions, the instrument demonstrated acceptable content validity. Pilot tests of the instrument demonstrated reliability and usability. Initial data analysis reveals the instrument can discriminate different levels of competencies. Results from using this instrument can guide educators in all settings in developing curricula for building nursing informatics competencies.

Author Details

Kathleen M. Hunter, PhD, RN-BC, CNE; Dee McGonigle, PhD, MSN, BSN, RN, CNE, FAAN, ANEF; Toni Hebda, PhD, RN, CNE

Sigma Membership

Phi Pi

Type

Presentation

Format Type

Text-based Document

Research Approach

N/A

Keywords:

Comptencies, Nursing informatics, informatics research

Conference Name

Nursing Education Research Conference 2014

Conference Host

Sigma Theta Tau International,National League for Nursing

Conference Location

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Conference Year

2014

Rights Holder

All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.

All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.

All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.

Review Type

Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host

Acquisition

Proxy-submission

Additional Files

download (631 kB)

Share

COinS
 

TIGER-Based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC)

Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Session presented on: Saturday, April 5, 2014: Problem: Decision making requires data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in today's data- and technology-rich environments. Nurses need nursing-informatics (NI) competencies to support their decision making. The TIGER Initiative published NI competencies for all nurses, encompassing basic computer skills, information literacy, and clinical-information management. Reliable, valid measures to assess these competencies are lacking. This research aimed to develop a reliable, valid online instrument for self-assessment of perceived NI competencies based on the TIGER competencies. Methods: Instrument development involved concept definition, establishing the objective, and identification of items. Three competency scales were created: basic computer, information literacy, and clinical-information management. Three external NI experts independently confirmed retention of all items in each scale. Items were rewritten with behavioral verbs. Three external NI experts assessed content validity of each scale. The TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) was piloted with members of an online NI discussion forum. Results: The sample of 168 respondents was predominantly female nurses, 26-70 years of age, with a master's degree in nursing and 2-5 years of NI practice but not certified. Content validity, internal-consistency reliability, and a factor analysis were calculated. Mean scores on a scale of 1 to 4 were: basic-computer competencies (3.975), information-literacy competencies (3.226), and clinical-information-management competencies (3.358). Reliability coefficients for the 3 scales ranged from 0.948 to 0.980. Specific results for each scale and the instrument as a whole will be shared. Conclusions: TIGER competencies establish a foundation for developing a self-assessment of perceived NI competencies. The TIGER competencies required revision to incorporate measurable behaviors. After review and revisions, the instrument demonstrated acceptable content validity. Pilot tests of the instrument demonstrated reliability and usability. Initial data analysis reveals the instrument can discriminate different levels of competencies. Results from using this instrument can guide educators in all settings in developing curricula for building nursing informatics competencies.