Other Titles
Issues Affecting Educators [Session]
Abstract
Session presented on Saturday, April 9, 2016: The growth and maturation of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs has prompted continuing curricular discussion and debate, especially regarding the required culminating program scholarship which has taken on a variety of forms and designations. There has even been argument that any sort of final project should not be required in practice-focused education. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2006) describes the final scholarship of DNP education as "...a practice application-oriented final DNP project, which is an integral part of the integrative practice experience" (p. 4), allowing individual programs to delineate this application-based product. A 10 question online survey was administered anonymously via Survey Monkey from June to October 2014 to examine the opinions and preferences of DNPs and academics involved in doctoral nursing education about the required DNP program final product. The survey collected demographic information; opinions about the necessity and rigor of a final project, and the use of the term 'dissertation' for the project; and preferences for what a final project should be called. An invitation to participate and a link to the survey were posted on a national DNP online community blog, and e-mailed to the leadership and DNP faculty of DNP programs across the country with an attempt to invite individuals from as many DNP programs as possible to complete the survey. A diverse sample of 849 respondents from 49 states (except South Dakota), Canada and Puerto Rico completed the survey. DNPs accounted for 54.9% (465) of the sample, 24% (203) were DNP students, 15.1% (128) were not DNPs but taught in DNP programs, and 2.2. % (19) were doctoral nursing educators who were not DNPs and did not teach DNPs. Academia was reported by 48.75% (411) of the respondents as their primary employment, 32.45% (2730) reported practice employment, and 9.6% (81) identified themselves as administrators. The average age of the respondents was 51.4 (SD 9.5), 90.6% (765) were female and 9.4% (79) were male. The average numbers of years in nursing was 26.3 (SD 11). As a whole the sample represented experienced academics and clinicians. Seventy six percent (642) of the respondents felt that a culminating scholarly project should be required in DNP education, with 78.9% (662) reporting that if a culminating project was required that it should have the same expectations of rigor as other doctoral nursing education culminating projects such as PhD dissertations. Over half (53.4%; 450) felt that the term 'dissertation' should not be restricted to designate only the culminating projects of nursing PhD programs. Slightly less than a third (31.1%; 253) felt DNP culminating projects should be called 'dissertations,' 29.1% (237) felt they should be called 'capstones,' 25.5% (207) chose 'projects,' 3.9% (32) chose 'thesis,' and 10.3% (84) 'other.' Subgroup analyses demonstrated age-based, regional, and degree-based variation in responses. Many unsolicited comments were collected via the blog page and direct e-mails to the researchers. The comments represented a wide variety of passionate opinions about the final DNP project and the future of DNP education.
Sigma Membership
Gamma Tau at-Large
Type
Presentation
Format Type
Text-based Document
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Doctoral nursing education, DNP education, Culminating DNP program scholarship
Recommended Citation
Daroszewski, Ellen Beth, "National Survey of Opinions and Preferences About the Required Culminating Project of DNP Programs" (2016). NERC (Nursing Education Research Conference). 14.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/nerc/2016/presentations_2016/14
Conference Name
Nursing Education Research Conference 2016
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International,National League for Nursing
Conference Location
Washington, DC, USA
Conference Year
2016
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
National Survey of Opinions and Preferences About the Required Culminating Project of DNP Programs
Washington, DC, USA
Session presented on Saturday, April 9, 2016: The growth and maturation of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs has prompted continuing curricular discussion and debate, especially regarding the required culminating program scholarship which has taken on a variety of forms and designations. There has even been argument that any sort of final project should not be required in practice-focused education. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2006) describes the final scholarship of DNP education as "...a practice application-oriented final DNP project, which is an integral part of the integrative practice experience" (p. 4), allowing individual programs to delineate this application-based product. A 10 question online survey was administered anonymously via Survey Monkey from June to October 2014 to examine the opinions and preferences of DNPs and academics involved in doctoral nursing education about the required DNP program final product. The survey collected demographic information; opinions about the necessity and rigor of a final project, and the use of the term 'dissertation' for the project; and preferences for what a final project should be called. An invitation to participate and a link to the survey were posted on a national DNP online community blog, and e-mailed to the leadership and DNP faculty of DNP programs across the country with an attempt to invite individuals from as many DNP programs as possible to complete the survey. A diverse sample of 849 respondents from 49 states (except South Dakota), Canada and Puerto Rico completed the survey. DNPs accounted for 54.9% (465) of the sample, 24% (203) were DNP students, 15.1% (128) were not DNPs but taught in DNP programs, and 2.2. % (19) were doctoral nursing educators who were not DNPs and did not teach DNPs. Academia was reported by 48.75% (411) of the respondents as their primary employment, 32.45% (2730) reported practice employment, and 9.6% (81) identified themselves as administrators. The average age of the respondents was 51.4 (SD 9.5), 90.6% (765) were female and 9.4% (79) were male. The average numbers of years in nursing was 26.3 (SD 11). As a whole the sample represented experienced academics and clinicians. Seventy six percent (642) of the respondents felt that a culminating scholarly project should be required in DNP education, with 78.9% (662) reporting that if a culminating project was required that it should have the same expectations of rigor as other doctoral nursing education culminating projects such as PhD dissertations. Over half (53.4%; 450) felt that the term 'dissertation' should not be restricted to designate only the culminating projects of nursing PhD programs. Slightly less than a third (31.1%; 253) felt DNP culminating projects should be called 'dissertations,' 29.1% (237) felt they should be called 'capstones,' 25.5% (207) chose 'projects,' 3.9% (32) chose 'thesis,' and 10.3% (84) 'other.' Subgroup analyses demonstrated age-based, regional, and degree-based variation in responses. Many unsolicited comments were collected via the blog page and direct e-mails to the researchers. The comments represented a wide variety of passionate opinions about the final DNP project and the future of DNP education.