Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of clinical rounds as a post conference strategy in the development of clinical judgment. Quantitative data demonstrated an increase in mean scores in clinical rounding groups (n=33; +0.76). Qualitative data revealed increased problem-solving ability and risk identification among students who participated in clinical rounding.
Sigma Membership
Pi Chi
Type
Poster
Format Type
Text-based Document
Research Approach
N/A
Keywords:
Clinical Judgment, Clinical Teaching Strategy, Undergraduate Nursing Education
Recommended Citation
Stroup, Carrie, "Round and round we go: Utilizing post conference clinical rounds to improve clinical judgment" (2020). NERC (Nursing Education Research Conference). 78.
https://www.sigmarepository.org/nerc/2020/posters_2020/78
Conference Name
Nursing Education Research Conference 2020
Conference Host
Sigma Theta Tau International,National League for Nursing
Conference Location
Washington, DC, USA
Conference Year
2020
Rights Holder
All rights reserved by the author(s) and/or publisher(s) listed in this item record unless relinquished in whole or part by a rights notation or a Creative Commons License present in this item record.
All permission requests should be directed accordingly and not to the Sigma Repository.
All submitting authors or publishers have affirmed that when using material in their work where they do not own copyright, they have obtained permission of the copyright holder prior to submission and the rights holder has been acknowledged as necessary.
Review Type
Abstract Review Only: Reviewed by Event Host
Acquisition
Proxy-submission
Round and round we go: Utilizing post conference clinical rounds to improve clinical judgment
Washington, DC, USA
This study examined the effectiveness of clinical rounds as a post conference strategy in the development of clinical judgment. Quantitative data demonstrated an increase in mean scores in clinical rounding groups (n=33; +0.76). Qualitative data revealed increased problem-solving ability and risk identification among students who participated in clinical rounding.